2023
DOI: 10.31756/jrsmte.214si
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary Debates on Equity in STEM Education: Takeaways From a Doctoral Seminar in Equity in STEM Education

Abstract: As the emerging field of equity in STEM education continues to grow, debates surrounding how to best serve populations with historically restricted access and successful outcomes within the STEM fields is growing as well. In this article, a group of doctoral students who took a course titled Equity in STEM Education and discusses their takeaways regarding the literature discussed in the course. The topics covered in this article will center around Gutiérrez’s (2007) equity framework of power, identity, access,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 79 publications
(121 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These top-down efforts slowed down the development of social justice mathematics (SJM) and its critical interrogation of why mathematics should be learned, why it offers social capital and how identity and power are constructed vis-à-vis mathematics. Despite this context, researchers began to advance sociocultural and sociopolitical perspectives in mathematics education (Goldberg et al, 2023). Gutiérrez (2013: 37-8) rightly pointed out this critical moment, suggesting that 'we are at a moment in history where we have ready excuses not to attend to issues of identity and power in mathematics educationafter all, what does power have to do with a rational, universal field like mathematics?'…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These top-down efforts slowed down the development of social justice mathematics (SJM) and its critical interrogation of why mathematics should be learned, why it offers social capital and how identity and power are constructed vis-à-vis mathematics. Despite this context, researchers began to advance sociocultural and sociopolitical perspectives in mathematics education (Goldberg et al, 2023). Gutiérrez (2013: 37-8) rightly pointed out this critical moment, suggesting that 'we are at a moment in history where we have ready excuses not to attend to issues of identity and power in mathematics educationafter all, what does power have to do with a rational, universal field like mathematics?'…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%