2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Content analysis of fake consumer reviews by survey-based text categorization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposed conceptual and process models can serve as inspiration for the introduction of systematic and thus more credible procedures for reviewing tourism services, attractions and destinations. This approach is very important for e-marketing, especially at the present time, when increased attention is being paid in expert assessments, scientific articles and media to fake reviews (Streitfield 2011;Smith 2013;Lipson 2016;Zhang et al 2016;Song et al 2017;Buccafurri et al 2018;Cardoso et al 2018;Barbado et al 2019;Fedeli 2020;Wu et al 2020;Kauffmann et al 2020;Gadek and Guélorget 2020;Moon et al 2020). The presented models should be verified by simulation based on real data, which demonstrates a reduction in the share of published false reviews and thus an increase in trust in review sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proposed conceptual and process models can serve as inspiration for the introduction of systematic and thus more credible procedures for reviewing tourism services, attractions and destinations. This approach is very important for e-marketing, especially at the present time, when increased attention is being paid in expert assessments, scientific articles and media to fake reviews (Streitfield 2011;Smith 2013;Lipson 2016;Zhang et al 2016;Song et al 2017;Buccafurri et al 2018;Cardoso et al 2018;Barbado et al 2019;Fedeli 2020;Wu et al 2020;Kauffmann et al 2020;Gadek and Guélorget 2020;Moon et al 2020). The presented models should be verified by simulation based on real data, which demonstrates a reduction in the share of published false reviews and thus an increase in trust in review sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…• statistical methods (Hu et al 2012;Song et al 2017;Harris 2018;Kumar et al 2019), • text analysis (Harris 2018;Barbado et al 2019;Kauffmann et al 2020), which in recent years includes sentiment/emotional analysis and its relationship to overall evaluation (Harris 2018;Martinez-Torres and Toral 2019;Valdivia et al 2019;Gadek and Guélorget 2020;Moon et al 2020),…”
Section: Methods For Detecting False Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a need for higher institutions to offer various English translation practices and introduce English translation methods into classroom teaching. English translation is the main manifestation of students' comprehensive English proficiency and evaluation of their English practical abilities [21]. Most importantly, more opportunities should be provided for students to practice translation outside the classroom, cultivate their interest in learning, and improve their learning enthusiasm.…”
Section: Basic Concept and Technical Routementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trust-building capacity of star ratings as well as the financial premium of a good reputation has been demonstrated repeatedly and for various contexts (Abramova et al 2017;Teubner et al 2017). Consequently, recent research has started to shift on the pitfalls and issues of rating systems, such as rating skewness (Teubner and Glaser 2018), rating inflation over time (Filippas et al 2017), fake reviews (Moon et al 2020;Wu et al 2020), as well as rating response mechanisms and strategies (Abramova et al 2015;Greiner et al 2020).…”
Section: Rating Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%