2022
DOI: 10.2196/34050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Content Analysis of Nicotine Poisoning (Nic Sick) Videos on TikTok: Retrospective Observational Infodemiology Study

Abstract: Background TikTok is a microvideo social media platform currently experiencing rapid growth and with 60% of its monthly users between the ages of 16 and 24 years. Increased exposure to e-cigarette content on social media may influence patterns of use, including the risk of overconsumption and possible nicotine poisoning, when users engage in trending challenges online. However, there is limited research assessing the characteristics of nicotine poisoning–related content posted on social media. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to YouTube, this daily consumption is larger (based on one report, users spent 19 average daily minutes on YouTube in 2022 [24]), despite the fact that YouTube's videos have a longer duration. Also, we find that younger participants (aged between 18-24 years old) spent more time on Tik-Tok compared to older participants (e.g., aged between [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. This result prompts the need for further investigation into how younger people use TikTok, particularly, to investigate potential social media addiction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to YouTube, this daily consumption is larger (based on one report, users spent 19 average daily minutes on YouTube in 2022 [24]), despite the fact that YouTube's videos have a longer duration. Also, we find that younger participants (aged between 18-24 years old) spent more time on Tik-Tok compared to older participants (e.g., aged between [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. This result prompts the need for further investigation into how younger people use TikTok, particularly, to investigate potential social media addiction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Much of the prior work on TikTok has studied the recommendation algorithm [40,1,6,18,35,34], the content on the platform [3,13,28,46,19,48,37,21,44,45,31], and performed user studies on TikTok users [49,32,17,18,26,8,30,22]. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to investigate user behavior through the lens of data donated directly from users using the rights of data subjects.…”
Section: Tiktokmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual annotation and content analysis of the TikTok videos were conducted by TJM, AC, and MCN. Coding was approached inductively due to the exploratory nature of the study, prior studies that have examined TikTok primarily using an inductive coding approach for TikTok videos and texts, and due to the lack of existing studies that have coded TikTok content related to synthetic drugs [ 14 ]. Authors generated a data set with binary classifications of whether the video discussed content related to adverse effects, selling, and consumption of K2/Spice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it has also been increasingly used to obtain health-related information, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, the quality of information on TikTok can vary widely, may not always be reliable, and can be harmful [10][11][12]. Harmful information found on TikTok includes sharing experiences and positive sentiment related to substance use [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the prominence of TikTok, studies from different cultures have focused on its use in various contexts, such as entertainment ( Meng and Leung, 2021 ), political communication ( Cervi et al, 2021 ), and infodemiology ( Purushothaman et al, 2022 ). The motivations underlying its use have drawn researchers’ attention (for review, see Montag et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%