2021
DOI: 10.20527/bino.v3i1.9348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contents Practicality of the Popular Ethnobotany Scientific Book of Gliricidia maculata in the Tamiang Hill Forest Area, Tanah Laut Regency

Abstract: The teaching materials need to see the reader's ability for how to understand the intent, to know the feasibility, and also for improvement practical content. This study wants to describe the contents practicality of popular scientific book on the ethnobotany’s Gliricidia maculata as supporting material for ethnobotany courses in biology education, FKIP ULM Banjarmasin. Ethnobotany popular scientific book refers to Tessmer Formative Evaluation with the steps on content practicality using individual tests (one … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After studying the material in textbooks, students were asked to answer a questionnaire on student responses to the textbooks developed or referred to as textbook practicality. The product practicality test is needed as one of the requirements for developing quality learning tools (Putra et al, 2021). The practicality of a developed teaching material can be measured by looking at the use of teaching materials by educators and students and the level of involvement (Budiningsih et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After studying the material in textbooks, students were asked to answer a questionnaire on student responses to the textbooks developed or referred to as textbook practicality. The product practicality test is needed as one of the requirements for developing quality learning tools (Putra et al, 2021). The practicality of a developed teaching material can be measured by looking at the use of teaching materials by educators and students and the level of involvement (Budiningsih et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%