2012
DOI: 10.1111/insp.12000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contested Identity and Foreign Policy: Interpreting Russia's International Choices

Abstract: This paper develops a framework for interpreting state international policy by treating national identity as inherently contested. Building on insights from constructivist literature, it proposes a technique for establishing the meaning of foreign policy action on several interrelated levels: state‐based, society‐based, and international. The paper illustrates the benefits of the approach by selecting the example of Russia's European diplomacy under President Dmitri Medvedev. By studying how officials themselv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
16
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It was based, as well, on a consensus that Russia was no longer a major power and, thus, its views could be ignored with relative impunity, since it was in no position to back up its complaints with meaningful action (Kanet and Ibryamova, 2001;Kanet, 2010a). This Western downplaying of Russia's place in the international system directly challenged the sense of honour and status that, in the view of Tsygankov and others, lies at the very heart of Russian foreign policy (Heller, 2012;Tsygankov, 2012Tsygankov, , 2014Moulioukova and Kanet, 2015). Western behaviour fed Russian nationalist paranoia, a paranoia that Vladimir Putin has done much to expand and effectively manipulate (Umland, 2015).…”
Section: Russia's Turn To the West And The West's Attempted Eastward mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was based, as well, on a consensus that Russia was no longer a major power and, thus, its views could be ignored with relative impunity, since it was in no position to back up its complaints with meaningful action (Kanet and Ibryamova, 2001;Kanet, 2010a). This Western downplaying of Russia's place in the international system directly challenged the sense of honour and status that, in the view of Tsygankov and others, lies at the very heart of Russian foreign policy (Heller, 2012;Tsygankov, 2012Tsygankov, , 2014Moulioukova and Kanet, 2015). Western behaviour fed Russian nationalist paranoia, a paranoia that Vladimir Putin has done much to expand and effectively manipulate (Umland, 2015).…”
Section: Russia's Turn To the West And The West's Attempted Eastward mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his view, a combination of material capabilities and the layered interactions of all actors involved in and outside the state can create heavily constrained ideational possibilities for decision-makers, 'but not enough to deprive them of meaningful choices'. 34 Suggestively for our purposes Tsygankov pointed out that IR has developed around 'Western'…”
Section: Foreign Policy Traditions Dilemmas and Situated Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last tension emphasises the EU and Russia's contrasting understanding of norms, values and legitimacy in the international system (Tsygankov 2014;Rutland 2012;White and Feklyunina 2014). On the one hand, the EU puts emphasis on multilateralism solidarity and ethical behaviour in international relations.…”
Section: The Clash Of Values and Worldviews Between The Eu And Russiamentioning
confidence: 99%