Contested takeovers of family firms and socioemotional wealth: a case study

Abstract

Purpose -This paper provides an understanding of the importance of socioemotional wealth to family firms in Poland viewed through the lens of the events surrounding the first hostile takeover bid of the post-communist era on the Warsaw Stock Exchange when the clothing company Vistula & Wólczanka (V&W) made an unsolicited, leveraged bid for the family-controlled jewellery company W. Kruk.Design/methodology/approach -The 2008 takeover and its aftermath are described in the context of the corporate governance and legal environment in Poland. The case study events demonstrate the connection between firm behavior and socioemotional wealth theory.Findings -After the acquisition of W. Kruk by V&W, the Kruk family purchased stock in the newly named Vistula Group and gained influence over the supervisory board in concert with a business ally, eventually wresting back control of the company in the style of a Pac-Man 'defence'. The case study illustrates the importance of socioemotional wealth in family firm takeovers.Research limitations/implications -The case-study design has limitations for generalizability. Nevertheless the research highlights the relevance of socioemotional wealth preservation in understanding the market for control of listed family firms in Poland.Practical implications -Understanding the reaction by family firms to takeover bids requires recognition that there is a tradeoff between financial and socioemotional wealth considerations, not just financial gains and losses.Originality/value -The case study demonstrates the importance of socioemotional wealth to family firms and suggests that the balance of power in takeovers on the Polish stock market rests with incumbent management.

Family Business Restructuring: A Review and Research Agenda

“…Business restructuring does not necessarily end family involvement (Campbell and Jerzemowska, 2017; Steen and Welch, 2006) and this is often overlooked during integration. One exception is Vaara (2003) who investigates a Finnish family firm and focuses his analysis on cultural issues affecting integration to identify hidden, political issues shaping the process.…”

Socioemotional wealth (SEW) as the driver of business performance in family businesses in Bosnia and Herzegovina: the mediating role of transformational leadership

“…Considering the existing disagreements on family business definition (Campbell and Jerzemowska, 2017), this study classified the firms as “family businesses” based on the owner's identification. A similar approach was used by Llanos-Contreras and Jabri (2019).…”

Family- and non-family-related reasons for entrepreneurial exits

“…, 2015). This exit strategy results in significant shifts in the ownership structure and an increase in the founder's visibility in the market (Campbell and Jerzemowska, 2017; Sanguineti et al. , 2022).…”

“…The financial harvest exit strategy refers to the sale of a business, and usually offers high financial returns to exiting entrepreneurs (DeTienne et al, 2015). This exit strategy results in significant shifts in the ownership structure and an increase in the founder's visibility in the market (Campbell and Jerzemowska, 2017;Sanguineti et al, 2022). The financial harvest exit strategy is considered to be the most successful and desirable by entrepreneurs who favour their personal financial gains over other targets (DeTienne and Chirico, 2013).…”