Contesting Property Development in Coastal New Zealand: A Case Study of Ocean Beach, Hawke's Bay

Abstract

This article considers the contested process of coastal development in New Zealand and the implications of both governmental regulation and public concern for understanding property. Its empirical focus is a proposal for a substantial, new urbanist development at Ocean Beach, located in the Hawke's Bay region of the North Island. Three key sources of data inform the research: published reports; public submissions to council; and interviews with a sample of those involved in the planning process. Opposition to development is explained in terms of three broad areas of concern: the dramatic physical and social changes that would accompany subdivision and construction; fears of a loss of control over a valued local landscape; and a morally informed sense of propriety. The article finds that the ownership model of property is not especially powerful at Ocean Beach; rather, there is a broad consensus that private property rights exist within a public planning framework. It is this framework that contributes, in large part, to ensuring that voices of community opposition to property development at Ocean Beach (and elsewhere along the coast) are heard. Nevertheless, private property rights are rarely dismissed completely. Copyright (c) 2009 The Author. Journal Compilation(c) 2009 Joint Editors and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

‘Pulling up the Tent Pegs?’ The Significance and Changing Status of Coastal Campgrounds in New Zealand

“…[providing] year-round activity and a year-round benefit to the people in terms of the economy'. Analogous claims have been made at Ocean Beach (Collins 2009) and elsewhere along the New Zealand coast. In this case, however, the point was contested by a local storeowner, who might have been expected to benefit from any increased economic activity associated with residential development:…”

“…As Collins and Kearns (2008) note, New Zealanders tend to have an ambivalent relationship towards the Gold Coast, seeing it as both an attractive holiday destination and an example of gross overdevelopment. The sense of exasperation associated with landuse change in Mahia led one camper to challenge the capitalist foundations of the property market -a sentiment which is unusual, but not unheard of, in expressions of concern about contemporary coastal development (Collins 2009): 'Somebody has to draw a line in the sand and say, "Look, we're all equal in this country. Just because Downloaded by [134.117.10.200] at 16:13 16 March 2015…”

“…assessments of the coastal camping landscape. In so doing, we sought to connect cultural geography's long-standing concern for humanistic assessments of place (Cosgrove 1978;Anderson and Gale 1992) with recent scholarship that documents and seeks to account for the effects of property development and demographic change on coastal landscapes that are symbolically charged, as well as physically sensitive (Gurran et al 2007;Collins 2009). Specific themes identified included: normative ideas around appropriate forms of coastal camping; notions of belonging, attachment and sense of place associated with campgrounds; and concerns and fears regarding the loss of camping opportunities.…”

Place attachment and community activism at the coast: The case of Ngunguru, Northland

“…The latter were frequently to the fore during the real estate boom of 2002–2007 (Peart ). Widespread coastal development at this time was often portrayed as to the detriment of affordability, accessibility and heritage and landscape values (Cheyne & Freeman ; Collins & Kearns , ; Collins ; Peart ). For Collins and Kearns (, p. 2914) widespread concern about coastal development at that time spoke to ‘a perception that coastal landscapes imagined as public, democratic, and relatively unspoiled are being transformed into elite and privatized spaces with a heavy human imprint.’…”

The Evolution of the Coastal Economy: The Role of Working Waterfronts in the Alabama Gulf Coast

“…Working waterfronts are defined as parcels of real property that provide access to water-dependent and water-related commercial activities or to the public to the navigable waters of a state. Economic activities dependent on working waterfronts play important roles in the development and sustainability of different coastal economies [3]. Both endogenous and exogenous changes in the final demand for working waterfront output (also known as the direct economic impact) can be expected to show up as changes in the gross output of water-related industries (e.g., seafood processing, boat and ship building, water transportation).…”