2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-015-0828-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continental crust formation at arcs, the arclogite “delamination” cycle, and one origin for fertile melting anomalies in the mantle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
58
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
3
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An indirect line of evidence for a thick southwestern Tian Shan crust is the corroborative igneous‐ and detrital‐zircon Hf pull‐up from intermediate–evolved to juvenile values subsequent to the end of Gissar‐arc magmatism at ~288–286 Ma (Figure ), which indicates a rapid shift from an evolved/crust‐derived to a juvenile/mantle‐derived melt source at this time. We interpret this change in melt source to indicate asthenospheric upwelling due to lithospheric foundering (Figures and ) [e.g., Zandt et al , ], which implies the prior existence of a crust that was thick enough for its root to have densified beyond a gravitational steady state via the formation of an “arclogite” root [e.g., Lee and Anderson , ]. This thick crust apparently developed over ~10–15 Myr, subsequent to the onset of formation of the Turkestan and Gissar sutures and the Karakum‐Tarim‐Kazakh‐Kyrgyz continental collision in the southwestern Tian Shan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An indirect line of evidence for a thick southwestern Tian Shan crust is the corroborative igneous‐ and detrital‐zircon Hf pull‐up from intermediate–evolved to juvenile values subsequent to the end of Gissar‐arc magmatism at ~288–286 Ma (Figure ), which indicates a rapid shift from an evolved/crust‐derived to a juvenile/mantle‐derived melt source at this time. We interpret this change in melt source to indicate asthenospheric upwelling due to lithospheric foundering (Figures and ) [e.g., Zandt et al , ], which implies the prior existence of a crust that was thick enough for its root to have densified beyond a gravitational steady state via the formation of an “arclogite” root [e.g., Lee and Anderson , ]. This thick crust apparently developed over ~10–15 Myr, subsequent to the onset of formation of the Turkestan and Gissar sutures and the Karakum‐Tarim‐Kazakh‐Kyrgyz continental collision in the southwestern Tian Shan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure , andesites are enriched in LILEs and LREEs and U and Th, and relatively depleted in HFSEs (such as Nb, Ta, P, and Ti), showing enriched Sr–Nd–Pb isotope compositions. There are four possible interpretations for achieving these geochemical features: (a) mixing between supracrustal melts and mantle‐derived melts, (b) partial melting of an ancient mafic lower crust, (c) a mantle wedge metasomatized by fluids or melts derived from the subducting oceanic plate slab, and (d) originating from a long‐term evolved lithospheric mantle (Huang et al, ; Lee & Anderson, ; X. L. Wang, Jiang, & Dai, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an inevitable process during crust accretion-related magmatism, crust-mantle interaction has been the subject of much research. Models have been proposed to characterize crust-mantle interaction such as "underplating", "delamination", "convective removal", "tectonic erosion" (Bergantz, 1989;Clift et al, 2009;Conrad and Molnar, 1997;Kay and Kay, 1993;Lee, 2012;Lee and Anderson, 2015). All these are probable processes, but details of these processes need better understanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%