2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011jf002140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continental scale, high order, high spatial resolution, ice sheet modeling using the Ice Sheet System Model (ISSM)

Abstract: [1] Ice flow models used to project the mass balance of ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica usually rely on the Shallow Ice Approximation (SIA) and the Shallow-Shelf Approximation (SSA), sometimes combined into so-called "hybrid" models. Such models, while computationally efficient, are based on a simplified set of physical assumptions about the mechanical regime of the ice flow, which does not uniformly apply everywhere on the ice sheet/ice shelf system, especially near grounding lines, where rapid changes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
598
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 458 publications
(608 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
10
598
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments are based on the MISMIP3D configurations. We use the Ice Sheet System Model (ISSM, Larour et al, 2012) to solve the 2-D shelfy-stream equations with spatial resolutions varying between 5 km and 250 m. We analyze the grounding line steady state position, its evolution following a perturbation in basal friction and the reversibility of its evolution for the different grounding line parameterizations. We conclude on the requirements needed to accurately capture grounding line motion and the impact of the underlying parameterization.…”
Section: H Seroussi Et Al: Grounding Line Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments are based on the MISMIP3D configurations. We use the Ice Sheet System Model (ISSM, Larour et al, 2012) to solve the 2-D shelfy-stream equations with spatial resolutions varying between 5 km and 250 m. We analyze the grounding line steady state position, its evolution following a perturbation in basal friction and the reversibility of its evolution for the different grounding line parameterizations. We conclude on the requirements needed to accurately capture grounding line motion and the impact of the underlying parameterization.…”
Section: H Seroussi Et Al: Grounding Line Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to this model as our forward model. This model is implemented within the Ice Sheet System Model (Larour et al, 2012c;Morlighem et al, 2010). Here, we are interested in the best fit between modeled surface heights and available altimetry observations.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to Larour et al (2012c) for more details on the FEM discretization as well as numerical schemes to handle the material nonlinearity and the stability of our time stepping.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a whole hierarchy of approaches to solve this problem (see for instance the ISMIP inter-comparison project, Pattyn et al, 2008). Recently, a few ice sheet models were designed to solving rigorously the full Stokes problem, but given the numerical cost they are usually restricted to a regional scale or can only afford a few century simulations; see Gillet-Chaulet et al (2012), Larour et al (2012). All the other ice sheet models use approximations based on the very small aspect ratio of ice sheets.…”
Section: Basis Of Ice Sheet Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%