1995
DOI: 10.1093/wber/9.3.373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contingent Valuation and Actual Behavior: Predicting Connections to New Water Systems in the State of Kerala, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that household decisions in the ex-post situation were influenced by factors different from those in the ex-ante situation. Moreover, of those households who said they would connect but had not connected, more than 75 percent reported inability to pay the connection cost as the major reason for their decision, while those who said they would not connect, but actually connected, cited "changed economic circumstances" as the major reasons for their decision (Griffin et al, 1995). These results suggest that the factors influencing an individual's willingness to pay are likely to be different from those influencing their actual behaviour.…”
Section: Factors Of Affecting Wtp For Water Servicesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that household decisions in the ex-post situation were influenced by factors different from those in the ex-ante situation. Moreover, of those households who said they would connect but had not connected, more than 75 percent reported inability to pay the connection cost as the major reason for their decision, while those who said they would not connect, but actually connected, cited "changed economic circumstances" as the major reasons for their decision (Griffin et al, 1995). These results suggest that the factors influencing an individual's willingness to pay are likely to be different from those influencing their actual behaviour.…”
Section: Factors Of Affecting Wtp For Water Servicesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the extant literature reviewed, only one study by Griffin et al (1995) has examined this question. Their "test-retest" type of contingent valuation (CV) study conducted ex-ante in 1988 and ex-post in 1991 in the Indian state of Kerala attempted to assess the extent to which willingness to pay for a house connection -which was assessed in 1988 -translated into actual behaviour (connection) following installation of the new piped water system three years later.…”
Section: Factors Of Affecting Wtp For Water Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CV studies have become more and more acceptable as a useful tool to estimate WTP for desirable quality water and are often used (Jordan and Elnagheeb 1993, Kwak and Russell 1994, Griffin et al 1995, Whittington et al 2002, Dasgupta and Dasgupta 2004 as an instrument where markets are absent, imperfect or incomplete. Studies by Kwak and Russel (1994), Whittington et al (2002), Dasgupta and Dasgupta (2004) have proved that a CV study, though unfamiliar in developing countries, is applicable for assessing WTP for water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consumers' WTP is becoming increasingly popular and is one of the standard approaches that is used by market researchers and economists to place a value on goods or services for which no market-based pricing mechanism exists [14,15]. Experiences show that very high level of WTP for water is observed in developing countries [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CVM still have serious methodological and theoretical shortcomings when used to assess WTP for non-market based goods and services, such as format bias, embedding effect, ordering problem, starting bid effects, strategic bias, information bias, non-response bias, payment vehicle, free rider problem, warm glow effect [22][23][24][25]. However, CVM is still useful tool for water resource management in developing countries [19,20,24]. The indirect approach involves observing consumers' behavior and modeling of behavior based on the approximate expenditure in terms of time and money to obtain the goods or services and infer about WTP through measurement of revealed preference [26,18,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%