2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-0826-6_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contingent Valuation in Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
111
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although subject to criticisms regarding reliability and validity across the literature, CVM has emerged as a valid tool in estimating the benefits/costs of non-market goods, particularly for direct use values (Arrow et al, 1993;Carson, 2000;Boyle, 2003) which is the case in this instance. If an individual, such as a farmer, has exclusive entitlement or property rights over a good, and is being asked to give up that entitlement in terms of exclusivity of use, then the correct measure within a contingent valuation framework is WTA (Carson et al, 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although subject to criticisms regarding reliability and validity across the literature, CVM has emerged as a valid tool in estimating the benefits/costs of non-market goods, particularly for direct use values (Arrow et al, 1993;Carson, 2000;Boyle, 2003) which is the case in this instance. If an individual, such as a farmer, has exclusive entitlement or property rights over a good, and is being asked to give up that entitlement in terms of exclusivity of use, then the correct measure within a contingent valuation framework is WTA (Carson et al, 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contingent valuation (CV) is a survey-based methodology for eliciting values people place on goods, services and amenities (Boyle, 2003). This methodology, initially proposed by Ciriacy-Wantrup (1947) and applied first by Davis (1963), asks people to directly value goods for which markets do not exist, and for which, demand is unobservable.…”
Section: Contingent Valuation Methods (Cvm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There can be no anchoring biases using this format. Nevertheless, theoretically, open-ended responses are not considered incentive compatible (Boyle, 2003). Moreover, they suffer from potentially large nonresponse rates, protest answers, zero bids and outliers which may all lead to unreliable responses (Mitchell and Carson, 1989).…”
Section: Open-endedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cameron et al (2002) find that OE formats tend to produce more conservative WTP estimates than DC. In this research, I use OE, and apply the Tobit model (Boyle, 2003), which doesn't al-low negative values and accommodates a probability spike at zero ($0). I also use a referendum question and analyze those values using a Logit model (see below).…”
Section: Contingent Valuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arrow et al (1993) recommend DC, while Boyle (2003) states that OE might have an advantage over other formats as it avoids bid anchoring. DC more closely approximates a market, as consumers are given prices, rather than asked to determine them, and OE questions might be more challenging for some respondents, which could result in non-response or underestimation of WTP (Loomis & White, 1996).…”
Section: Contingent Valuationmentioning
confidence: 99%