2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2009
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2009.5152851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous 3D scan-matching with a spinning 2D laser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
252
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
252
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimate of the 3D pose difference between the two points in time is then used to optimize the robot trajectory in between. In a similar approach Bosse and Zlot (2009) use a modified ICP with a custom correspondence search to optimize the pose of six discrete points in time of the trajectory of a robot during a single scanner rotation.…”
Section: Calibration Referencing and Slammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimate of the 3D pose difference between the two points in time is then used to optimize the robot trajectory in between. In a similar approach Bosse and Zlot (2009) use a modified ICP with a custom correspondence search to optimize the pose of six discrete points in time of the trajectory of a robot during a single scanner rotation.…”
Section: Calibration Referencing and Slammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm is adopted from Elseberg et al (2013), where it was used in a different mobile mapping context, i.e., on wheeled platforms. Unlike other state of the art algorithms, like (Stoyanov and Lilienthal, 2009) and (Bosse and Zlot, 2009), it is not restricted to purely local improvements. We make no rigidity assumptions, except for the computation of the point correspondences.…”
Section: Continuous-time Slammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We overcome this sparsity through probabilistic assignments of surfels during the registration process. While the many methods assume the robot to stand still during 3D scan acquisition, some approaches also integrate scan lines of a continuously rotating laser scanner into 3D maps while the robot is moving [4,7,24,13,1]. Up to now, such 3D laser scanners are rarely employed on lightweight MAVs due to their payload limitations and the difficulty of aggregating 3D scans in-flight.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system is handheld, extremely lightweight and uses a nodding scanner motion to acquire 3D data. Previously, Bosse and Zlot (2009) considered also spinning SICK laser scanners. Their point cloud optimization algorithm considers planar patches extracted from a sweep and deforms the trajectroy using a spline.…”
Section: Semi-rigid Slam For Trajectory Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%