2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002450010003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous-Time Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection: A Stochastic LQ Framework

Abstract: This paper is concerned with a continuous-time mean-variance portfolio selection model that is formulated as a bicriteria optimization problem. The objective is to maximize the expected terminal return and minimize the variance of the terminal wealth. By putting weights on the two criteria one obtains a single objective stochastic control problem which is however not in the standard form due to the variance term involved. It is shown that this nonstandard problem can be "embedded" into a class of auxiliary sto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
672
4
7

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 921 publications
(699 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
16
672
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodology in these papers relies upon the results on multi-index optimisation problems from the paper by Reid and Citron [17] and is more involved (in comparison with the simple conditioning combined with a double application of Lagrange multipliers as done in the present paper). In particular, the results of [10] and [24] do not establish the existence of statically optimal controls in the problems (2.4)-(2.6) although they do derive their closed form expressions in discrete and continuous time respectively. In this context it may be useful to recall that the first to point out that nonlinear dynamic programming problems may be tackled using the ideas of Lagrange multipliers was White in his paper [23].…”
Section: Static Versus Dynamic Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methodology in these papers relies upon the results on multi-index optimisation problems from the paper by Reid and Citron [17] and is more involved (in comparison with the simple conditioning combined with a double application of Lagrange multipliers as done in the present paper). In particular, the results of [10] and [24] do not establish the existence of statically optimal controls in the problems (2.4)-(2.6) although they do derive their closed form expressions in discrete and continuous time respectively. In this context it may be useful to recall that the first to point out that nonlinear dynamic programming problems may be tackled using the ideas of Lagrange multipliers was White in his paper [23].…”
Section: Static Versus Dynamic Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Returning to the stream of papers in the finance literature, the paper by Li and Ng [10, Theorems 1&2] in discrete time and the paper by Zhou and Li [24,Theorem 3.1] in continuous time show that if there is statically optimal control in the unconstrained problem (2.4) then this control can be found by solving a linear-quadratic optimal control problem (which in turn also yields statically optimal controls in the constrained problems (2.5) and (2.6)). The methodology in these papers relies upon the results on multi-index optimisation problems from the paper by Reid and Citron [17] and is more involved (in comparison with the simple conditioning combined with a double application of Lagrange multipliers as done in the present paper).…”
Section: Static Versus Dynamic Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the necessary maximum principle, Andersson and Djehiche (2011) obtained a candidate of the optimal control in a simplified control system without jump and delay. Although this candidate of the optimal control coincided with the optimal portfolio strategy found in Zhou and Li (2000)'s pioneering work, only the sufficient condition for optimality can verify that the candidate is indeed an optimal control of the problem. This motivates us to investigate again whether there exists a version of the sufficient maximum principle, which can be used to solve the bicriteria mean-variance problem.…”
Section: As Large Investors Any Decisions On Portfolio Choices Of Thmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, since the weighted average performance functional involves a nonlinear (quadratic) function of the expected term, even this equivalent single-objective optimization problem is time-inconsistent, where both Bellman's optimality principle and Pontryagin's maximum principle do not work. So the bicriteria mean-variance problem has long been investigated by the stochastic LQ theory with an ingenious embedding technique (see Zhou and Li, 2000). Only until recently, the stochastic maximum principle of mean-field type was found useful to solve the bicriteria mean-variance problem (see Anderson and Djehiche, 2011).…”
Section: Application To a Bicriteria Mean-variance Problem With Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then various authors have improved and extended the results, see for example Korn and Trautmann [12], Korn [13], Zhou and Li [18], Basak and Chabakauri [3], Kryger and Steffensen [15], Kronborg and Steffensen [14], Alp and Korn [1], Björk, Murgoci and Zhou [5] and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%