1995
DOI: 10.1063/1.113425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous wave near-infrared atomic Xe laser excited by a radio frequency discharge in a slab geometry

Abstract: Near-infrared atomic Xe laser lines have been generated from an Ar:He:Xe laser gas mixture excited by a radio frequency ͑rf͒ discharge in a slab geometry. A maximum continuous wave ͑cw͒ output power of 1.5 W ͑270 W/l͒ was obtained at an rf frequency of 125 MHz from a gas mixture containing Ar:He:Xe ͑50:49:1͒ at a total gas pressure of 90 Torr. © 1995 American Institute of Physics.There is a steady growing interest in sources of coherent radiation which operate in the wavelength region of 2-3 m.1 Possible appli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1, after a short time this peak drops down again and then the output power starts to increase like in the conventional long-time operation regime. A similar behaviour occurred in the laser with metal electrodes [1]. This initial peak in the output power increases with the Ar concentration and/or the input power in both lasers.…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1, after a short time this peak drops down again and then the output power starts to increase like in the conventional long-time operation regime. A similar behaviour occurred in the laser with metal electrodes [1]. This initial peak in the output power increases with the Ar concentration and/or the input power in both lasers.…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…However, at a pressure higher than about 200 mbar these values start to drop. The maximum efficiency of ~0.4% was obtained at a pressure of 160 mbar and an input power of 150 W. This result differs strongly from the the value in [1]. The efficiency is lower and it does not increase with an increase in input power.…”
Section: Experiments and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations