1993
DOI: 10.2172/10175312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuum and micromechanics treatment of constraint in fracture

Abstract: Two complementary methodologies are described to quantify the effects of crack-tip stress triaxiality (constraint) on the macroscopic measures of elastic-plastic fracture toughness, J and Crack-Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD). In the continuum mechanics methodology, two parameters, J and Q, suffice to characterize the full range of near-tip environments at the onset of fracture. J sets the size scale of the zone of high stresses and large deformations while Q scales the near-tip stress level relative to a high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
56
0
5

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
6
56
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe a key feature in the success of the present methodology, and of the Dodds-Anderson toughness scaling model as well, lies in the overall similarity of the crack-tip stress fields across the various geometries considered in this and previous studies [11,60]. The crack-tip stresses in through-crack and surface-crack specimens subjected to uniaxial tension or uniaxial bending all appear remarkably similar except for the amplitude.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We believe a key feature in the success of the present methodology, and of the Dodds-Anderson toughness scaling model as well, lies in the overall similarity of the crack-tip stress fields across the various geometries considered in this and previous studies [11,60]. The crack-tip stresses in through-crack and surface-crack specimens subjected to uniaxial tension or uniaxial bending all appear remarkably similar except for the amplitude.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The model enables robust predictions of constraint effects on cleavage fracture toughness provided the crack-tip stress fields of the various specimens differ only in the level oftriaxiality [60], i.e., contours of principal stress change only in "size" and not in "shape" under increased specimen loading. In contrast, consider two specimens which have the same material volume To overcome these limitations, the present work proposes a modified toughness scaling model to assess the combined effects of constraint variations and ductile tearing on cleavage fracture toughness data.…”
Section: A Modified Toughness Scaling Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The *-V* model [27], which represents the attainment of equivalent stressed volume V* for a given critical stress *, is another approach mainly used as a "toughness-scaling" model to predict the toughness variation from one specimen size to another. In its simple form, the statistical effects are not taken into account.…”
Section: Local Approach: *-V* Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They designated the amplitude of this approximate difference field by the letter Q, Two operational definitions of the Q-family of fields are presented in Ref. 17. The first definition is given in terms of the opening-mode stress, on, where SSY refers to the small-scale-yielding reference solution.…”
Section: Finite Element Models and Local Crack-tip Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%