The Large N Expansion in Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Physics 1993
DOI: 10.1142/9789814365802_0058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuum Schwinger-Dyson Equations and Universal Structures in Two-Dimensional Quantum Gravity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
141
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to G.Belyi and A.Grothendieck [21][22][23][24][25], existence of such representation is necessary and sufficient for arithmeticity of the curve and arithmetic curves are in one-to-one correspondence with the equilateral triangulations (dessins d'enfant). Thus, enumeration of Belyi pairs is a typical matrix model problem (see more on relations between counting the Belyi maps, Hurwitz numbers and matrix models in [26][27][28]), though equivalence of matrix model [29,30] and sumover-metrics descriptions [31,32], proved in [33,34] on the lines of [35][36][37][38][39][40][41] remains a big mystery from the point of view of the complicated embedding of moduli space of arithmetic curves into the entire moduli space, see [42] and, for a related consideration, [43]. The Belyi pairs are enumerated by the triple Hurwitz numbers N∆ 0 ,∆ 1 ,∆∞ , but no adequate language is still found to describe the full generating function…”
Section: Jhep11(2014)080mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to G.Belyi and A.Grothendieck [21][22][23][24][25], existence of such representation is necessary and sufficient for arithmeticity of the curve and arithmetic curves are in one-to-one correspondence with the equilateral triangulations (dessins d'enfant). Thus, enumeration of Belyi pairs is a typical matrix model problem (see more on relations between counting the Belyi maps, Hurwitz numbers and matrix models in [26][27][28]), though equivalence of matrix model [29,30] and sumover-metrics descriptions [31,32], proved in [33,34] on the lines of [35][36][37][38][39][40][41] remains a big mystery from the point of view of the complicated embedding of moduli space of arithmetic curves into the entire moduli space, see [42] and, for a related consideration, [43]. The Belyi pairs are enumerated by the triple Hurwitz numbers N∆ 0 ,∆ 1 ,∆∞ , but no adequate language is still found to describe the full generating function…”
Section: Jhep11(2014)080mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore we can also express (3.10) equivalently as the Virasoro constraints [37,38] L n Z = 0, n ≥ −1.…”
Section: Loop Equations and Collective Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also higher order relations [37,38]. In the case of A r there is leading spin r + 1 current that with a suitable basis of vectors ϕ 0 , .…”
Section: Quiver Theories and W -Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As explained in [27], the suitable operation, which categorifies the specializations a = q N , involves taking homology in the triply-graded theory with respect to differentials d N , N ∈ Z. Indeed, the "extra terms" in the superpolynomial P R (a, q, t) that are not part of P sl(N ),R (q, t) and otherwise would cancel upon setting t = −1 always come in pairs, so that a more proper version of (3.8) reads where R sl(N ),R (a, q, t) and Q sl(N ),R (a, q, t) are polynomials with non-negative coefficients, such that the sl(N ) homological invariant is a specialization of the "remainder" (not the full superpolynomial as in (3.8)): 10) whereas the extra pairs of terms in (3.9) that come from Q sl(N ),R (a, q, t) are killed by the differential d N of (a, q, t)-degree (α, β, γ).…”
Section: Sl(1)r Ij (K)mentioning
confidence: 99%