1988
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(88)90101-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuum yields from 12C(p,p′) at incident proton energies of 90 and 200 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present work represents an advance over these earlier approaches principally in two ways: (1) it makes use of recent improvements in nuclear model calculations and optimizes them for describing nuclear reactions in the 0 to 250 MeV energy region; and (2) new experimental information, which has become available since the earlier studies, is used extensively to guide the calculations. Perhaps the most important measurements of non elastic processes are the neutron cross section measurements by Benck et al [2], Haight et al [14], Nauchi et al [22], Slypen et al [27,28] and Subramanian et al, [29,30] and and the proton cross section measurements by Bertrand et al [3], Cowley [tl], F6rtsch et al [13] and Meier et al [18,19].…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work represents an advance over these earlier approaches principally in two ways: (1) it makes use of recent improvements in nuclear model calculations and optimizes them for describing nuclear reactions in the 0 to 250 MeV energy region; and (2) new experimental information, which has become available since the earlier studies, is used extensively to guide the calculations. Perhaps the most important measurements of non elastic processes are the neutron cross section measurements by Benck et al [2], Haight et al [14], Nauchi et al [22], Slypen et al [27,28] and Subramanian et al, [29,30] and and the proton cross section measurements by Bertrand et al [3], Cowley [tl], F6rtsch et al [13] and Meier et al [18,19].…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detector telescope consisted of a 1000 gm Si(AE) detector, followed by a 75 x 125 mm NaI(E) detector as described in [10], with an active collimator to define a solid angle of 0.9 msr and an angular acceptance of 2 ~ . The energy calibration of the silicon detector was based on a-particles from a 228Th source, whereas the (slightly non-linear) energy calibration of the NaI detector was determined from the kinematic shift of peaks due to scattering of protons from hydrogen and carbon in a thin plastic target.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data we compare with our calculations are taken from Ref. [33] and Ref. [34] for 12 C and 58 Ni targets, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With Datamentioning
confidence: 99%