2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2995630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contour-Aware Polyp Segmentation in Colonoscopy Images Using Detailed Upsampling Encoder-Decoder Networks

Abstract: Colorectal cancer has become one of the most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide, with a five-year survival rate of over 50%. Additionally, the potential of some common polyp types to progress to colorectal cancer is considered high. Colonoscopy is the most common method for finding and removing polyps. However, during colonoscopy, a significant number of polyps is missed as a result of human error mistakes. Thus, this study was primarily motivated by the need to obtain an early and accurate diagnosis o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the same test data were used in [ 69 ] as in this paper, compared to the results reported here, an additional 10,025 images from the CVC-Clinic VideoDB were used to train the U-Net with the dilatation convolution method. The results reported in [ 70 ] are better than for any other method listed in Table 4 . However, it seems these results were computed based on a random selection of images into the training and test subsets, rather than a random selection of video sequences, making the interpretation of the method performance somewhat difficult.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although the same test data were used in [ 69 ] as in this paper, compared to the results reported here, an additional 10,025 images from the CVC-Clinic VideoDB were used to train the U-Net with the dilatation convolution method. The results reported in [ 70 ] are better than for any other method listed in Table 4 . However, it seems these results were computed based on a random selection of images into the training and test subsets, rather than a random selection of video sequences, making the interpretation of the method performance somewhat difficult.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…( 10)) to measure the shape similarity among the ground Truth (G) and segmented images(S). The smaller Hausdorff distance represents the maximal similarity among the borders of S and G. [3] 0.81 Nguyen and Lee [4] 0.896 Zhang et al [5] 0.701 Jha et al [6] 0.848 Nguyen et al [7] 0.908 Bagheri et al [8] 0.82 Thanh and Long [9] 0.891 Feng et al [10] 0.929 Proposed model 0. Object wise Hausdorff distance (Hobj) is applied as shown in Eq (11) to find the object-wise contour-based shape similarity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nguyen et al [7] proposed the Detailed up-sampling based Encoder-Decoder Networks for Polyp Segmentations. However, when they evaluated the CVC-ColonDB, they attained a Dice score of 0.908.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11] authors proposed a CNN supported semantic-segmentation methodology to localize the GP from the CI, in [12] authors implemented CNN supported A-DenseUNet to extract and examine the GP fragment of CVC and Kvasir separately. Authors in [13] proposed MED-Net to separately evaluates CVC and ETIS datasets. The MED-Net is validated with few existing CNN schemes in the literature and the MED-Net provided a mean precision of 93.82% for ETIS and mean dice of 91.3% on CVC.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%