1995
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00277-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contour interaction in the presence of congenital nystagmus

Abstract: Using a computer-generated acuity task, the resolution of vertical and horizontal Landolt Cs was assessed at three levels of contrast, each for three different crowding conditions. Eighteen adults participated; six had congenital idiopathic nystagmus, six were oculocutaneous albinos and six served as controls. Contour interaction was evident when bars were placed 1 gap-width from the Landolt C and was more marked as contrast increased. When scaled to the individual resolution limit, the magnitude of contour in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five of these were conducted in a population of children with NV [7,20-22] and two were conducted in a population of VI adults [8,9]. Often, the distances over which contour interaction occurs are expressed in steps of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (MAR).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Five of these were conducted in a population of children with NV [7,20-22] and two were conducted in a population of VI adults [8,9]. Often, the distances over which contour interaction occurs are expressed in steps of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (MAR).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were two studies on contour interaction in VI adults [8,9] (see Figure 3). One study compared the full contour interaction area, the point of maximum contour interaction, and the peak magnitude of contour interaction between adults with NV and adults with congenital nystagmus (CN)[9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Visual function in patients with INS is affected by unpredictable combinations of ocular motor (eccentric null zones, damping with convergence, monocular intensity changes, periodicity, strabismus, poor smooth pursuit, OKN and attentional changes) and sensory system defects (ammetropia, amblyopia, photosensitivity, loss of contrast sensitivity, poor motion perception, decreased temporal luminance, impaired contour interaction, light interference and pre-chiasmal, chiasmal, post-chiasmal and maldevelopment) [22][23][24][25][26][27]. Visual functions directly affected include high spatial acuity vision, contrast sensitivity, motion detection, visual recognition time, gaze and time dependent vision, depth, stereopsis, smooth pursuit, vestibular and proprioceptive functions [23,[28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%