2009
DOI: 10.1109/tcsii.2008.2011611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contraction Theory and Master Stability Function: Linking Two Approaches to Study Synchronization of Complex Networks

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper contraction theory is applied to the problem of synchronization of a network. Particularly, the association between the contraction principle, the Lyapunov exponents of a system and the Master Stability Function of the network are pointed out. Novel, sufficient criteria warranting the fulfilment of a synchronous state are derived. Numerical simulations are used to validate the theoretical results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the proposed synchronization conditions for complex phase oscillator networks can be evaluated only numerically since they are state-dependent Kumagai, 1980, 1982) or arise from a non-trivial linearization process of full state space oscillator models. The latter procedure is adopted in the widely-studied Master Stability Function formalism, see (Pecora and Carroll, 1998;Boccaletti et al, 2006;Arenas et al, 2008) for the original reference and relevant surveys, see (Restrepo et al, 2004;Sun et al, 2009;Sorrentino and Porfiri, 2011) for its extension to quasi-identical oscillators, and see (Shafi et al, 2013;Russo and Di Bernardo, 2009) for related linearizationbased approaches from the control community.…”
Section: Survey Of Synchronization Metrics and Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the proposed synchronization conditions for complex phase oscillator networks can be evaluated only numerically since they are state-dependent Kumagai, 1980, 1982) or arise from a non-trivial linearization process of full state space oscillator models. The latter procedure is adopted in the widely-studied Master Stability Function formalism, see (Pecora and Carroll, 1998;Boccaletti et al, 2006;Arenas et al, 2008) for the original reference and relevant surveys, see (Restrepo et al, 2004;Sun et al, 2009;Sorrentino and Porfiri, 2011) for its extension to quasi-identical oscillators, and see (Shafi et al, 2013;Russo and Di Bernardo, 2009) for related linearizationbased approaches from the control community.…”
Section: Survey Of Synchronization Metrics and Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that many chaotic and hyperchaotic systems such as jerk family system, two-cell quantum-CNN, and modified Bloch equations with feedback field could be described by system (14). Expression (14) is an interesting form because it describes the whole complex chaotic system and makes its dynamics behavior analysis easy such as stability and bifurcations.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synchronization techniques have been improved in recent years, and many different methods are applied theoretically and experimentally to synchronize the chaotic systems which include back stepping design technique [4], projective synchronization (PS) [5], modified projective synchronization (MPS) [6,7], generalized synchronization [8], adaptive modified projective synchronization [9], lag synchronization [10], anticipating synchronization [11], phase synchronization [12], and their combinations [13]. Synchronization may involve several systems without a prescribed hierarchy (bidirectional) as it is the case in synchronization of networks of systems [14,15], often happening naturally, for instance, in certain biological systems. Another intensive area of research to emphasize within bidirectional synchronization is the study of the consensus paradigm (see an excellent text in [16]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include intrinsic observer design [AR03], consensus problems in complex networks [WS05], output regulation of nonlinear systems [PvdWN05], design of frequency estimators [SK08b], synchronization of coupled identical dynamical systems [RdBS09], construction of symbolic models for nonlinear control systems [PGT08,PT09,GPT09], and the analysis of bio-molecular systems [RdB09]. Our motivation comes from symbolic control where incremental stability was identified as a key property enabling the construction of finite abstractions of nonlinear control systems [PGT08,PT09,GPT09,ZPJT10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%