2016
DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2016.4.28994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast CT Scans in the Emergency Department Do Not Increase Risk of Adverse Renal Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(15 reference statements)
2
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The few remaining controlled studies demonstrated similar risks of dialysis and death between contrast material and control groups; however, these studies were small and did not control for selection bias (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Our current study corroborates the findings of these studies and offers several advances.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The few remaining controlled studies demonstrated similar risks of dialysis and death between contrast material and control groups; however, these studies were small and did not control for selection bias (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Our current study corroborates the findings of these studies and offers several advances.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Because these intraarterial studies inherently lacked a control population of patients who did not receive contrast material, the incidence of adverse outcomes attributable to contrast material cannot be extricated from contrast materialindependent causes. Second, a recent systematic review of controlled studies of intravenous contrast material exposure demonstrated that adverse outcomes directly attributable to intravenous contrast material administration are extremely rare (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Specifically, clinically important outcomes, particularly dialysis and death, have not been clearly linked to intravenous contrast material exposure.…”
Section: Advances In Knowledgementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous studies in emergency medical settings have shown wide variation in the incidence of postcontrast AKI (3.2%-12%); this may be partially explained by the variety of diseases encountered in the ED, as well as differences in the definitions of AKI adopted in each study. 6,7,[19][20][21][22][23][24]31 Nearly half of the patients (49%) in the present study experienced septic shock; thus, the increased incidence of postcontrast AKI in our patients (12.4%), compared with that observed in prior studies, may be attributed to the impaired physical status of our patients. This may also explain the considerably higher rates of emergent dialysis and short-term mortality, as well as the increased median length of hospital stay for survivors among our patients, compared to those parameters measured in other studies that did not focus on patients with sepsis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…This may also explain the considerably higher rates of emergent dialysis and short-term mortality, as well as the increased median length of hospital stay for survivors among our patients, compared to those parameters measured in other studies that did not focus on patients with sepsis. 21,34 Thus far, the pathophysiology of CA-AKI remains poorly characterised. Based on the results of some animal studies, proposed mechanisms include acute tubular necrosis caused by medullary hypoxia from vasoconstriction, as well as direct cytotoxic effects of the contrast agent on renal tubular cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation