Purpose: In magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, BLADE is used to compensate for head motion. The technique focuses mainly on acquisition of T 2 -weighted or contrast-enhanced T 1 -weighted images in adults; its utility for nonenhanced T 1 -weighted imaging in children is not well established. We compared the quality of T 1 -weighted ‰uid-attenuated inversion recovery brain imaging with BLADE (T 1 -FLAIR-BLADE) to that of conventional spin-echo T 1 -weighted imaging (T 1 -SE) in pediatric patients who cannot stay still during MR imaging.Materials and Methods: Our investigation included a volunteer study and a retrospective clinical study. Six healthy adult volunteers underwent scanning to compare the contrast of T 1 -SE, T 1 -weighted ‰uid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging (T 1 -FLAIR), and T 1 -FLAIR-BLADE at both 1.5 and 3 tesla. Comparison was based on scores assigned independently by 2 blinded observers and by calculated contrast-to-noise ratio. The clinical study included 20 children who underwent both T 1 -SE and T 1 -FLAIR-BLADE at either 1.5 (n=9) or 3 T (n=11). On each sequence, 2 blinded observers independently scored visualization of the cerebral gyri and contrast between gray and white matter. We compared scores between sequences separately for 1.5 and 3T using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.Results: At both 1.5 and 3T, contrast was better using T 1 -FLAIR and T 1 -FLAIR-BLADE than T 1 -SE in volunteers, and overall scores were signiˆcantly higher with T 1 -FLAIR-BLADE (Pº0.05) than T 1 -SE in the clinical study.Conclusion: T 1 -FLAIR-BLADE may be superior to T 1 -SE in demonstrating brain structures in children who cannot stay still and may be used to supplement or replace T 1 -SE when T 1 -SE is insu‹cient for patient motion.