2018
DOI: 10.3926/jiem.2656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting innovation competence FINCODA model in software engineering: Narrative review

Abstract: Purpose: Innovation competences are expected both in businesses and in higher education. Software organizations, in particular, require engineers that collaborate to deliver better services and products. Staff recruitment and training are human resource management tasks that are crucial to insuring that applicants and job holders have the competences that will facilitate quality output in software development processes.This paper seeks to determine the competences that describe high-performing, innovative prof… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The English questionnaire was translated into Chinese. (2018) [2] Technical innovation Product and service (technical) innovations scale Škerlavaj & Lee (2010) [17] Innovative organizational culture Innovative culture scale Škerlavaj & Lee (2010) [17] Organizational commitment…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The English questionnaire was translated into Chinese. (2018) [2] Technical innovation Product and service (technical) innovations scale Škerlavaj & Lee (2010) [17] Innovative organizational culture Innovative culture scale Škerlavaj & Lee (2010) [17] Organizational commitment…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work is framed within descriptive literature review and scoping review typologies [35,53]. The procedure followed for our systematic literature review is based on previous recommendations and working practices according to other authors [25,45,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. The methodology can be consulted in detail in the published research protocol [61].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%