2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10457-005-2402-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting rooting patterns of some arid-zone fruit tree species from Botswana – I. Fine root distribution

Abstract: To assess the possible degree of root competition from fruit trees which could potentially be used in agroforestry systems, fine root density of fruit trees Strychnos cocculoides BAK., Strychnos spinosa LAM. (Loganiaceae) and Vangueria infausta BURCH. (Rubiaceae), as well as from the shrubby species, Grewia flava DC. (Tiliaceae) was investigated. Vangueria infausta had the highest fine root densities in both vertical and horizontal extensions. In Vangueria infausta fine root density decreased with increasing s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) assessing the number of root channels, cluster number, cluster surface and cluster depth for the 100 cm 9 120 cm grids; and (3) calculating exploitation and exploration indices (after Oppelt et al 2005) for the 100 cm 9 120 cm grids. Root channels were distinguishable as vertical passages in softer albic sediments stretching into the cemented subsoil layers and featured concentrations of roots detectable either as a series of intersects along such a gallery or as root bundles where a channel was cut on the vertical plane.…”
Section: Sample and Data Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) assessing the number of root channels, cluster number, cluster surface and cluster depth for the 100 cm 9 120 cm grids; and (3) calculating exploitation and exploration indices (after Oppelt et al 2005) for the 100 cm 9 120 cm grids. Root channels were distinguishable as vertical passages in softer albic sediments stretching into the cemented subsoil layers and featured concentrations of roots detectable either as a series of intersects along such a gallery or as root bundles where a channel was cut on the vertical plane.…”
Section: Sample and Data Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the exploration E (1) index was defined as the number of cells having at least one root intersect in it. We calculated the latter indices by using number of fine root intersects per 100 cm 2 instead of fine root length density (Hughes et al 1995) or root surface area density (Oppelt et al 2005). These parameters are expected to yield better results than root intersects when comparisons between different species are to be made, as species-specific root lengths or areas can lead to different interpretations between surface areas and root numbers with regard to overall strategies for exploration and exploitation of resources.…”
Section: Sample and Data Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual soil volume (ISV) is the root system's overall envelope, given by its maximum radius (horizontal extension) and its maximum depth (vertical extension) [29], [30], [31], and thus quantifies root spread of an individual on a slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…whether more dense layers occur in the deeper horizons or not-was shown to modify rooting pattern in that roots were most concentrated above the strong soil layers or in relic root channels through them (Laclau et al 2001;Nambiar and Sands 1992;van Noordwijk et al 1991;Sudmeyer et al 2004). Root system models may be valuable tools of addressing this issue of nutrient acquisition by describing root system size, morphology and associated soil exploration or exploitation strategies (Berntson 1994;Oppelt et al 2005). More elaborated nutrient uptake models using external supply / internal demand regulations (Dunbabin et al 2002) already have been validated for Maize in the same region and on the same soil (Mollier et al 2001) and would be powerful tools to link total tree demand via the uptake system with soil available mineral nutrients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%