2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution from indoor sources to particle number and mass concentrations in residential houses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

33
314
6
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 509 publications
(390 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
33
314
6
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the results for particulate matter for slightly toasted agree with the ones described by He et al [45] who reported a median PM 2.5 level of 35 µg·m −3 for the peak values, which are lower than the PM 2.5 levels of 62.6 ± 27.7 µg·m −3 and PM 10 levels of 125.6 ± 87.1 µg·m −3 found for the toasting bread experiment in controlled conditions [18]. Both levels of medium and heavily toasted bread contributed to concentrations above the limit values for CH 2 Particulate matter levels (both PM2.5 and PM10) during the frying process were significantly higher than the ones found during the boiling process in both dwellings.…”
Section: Emissions From Toastingsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the results for particulate matter for slightly toasted agree with the ones described by He et al [45] who reported a median PM 2.5 level of 35 µg·m −3 for the peak values, which are lower than the PM 2.5 levels of 62.6 ± 27.7 µg·m −3 and PM 10 levels of 125.6 ± 87.1 µg·m −3 found for the toasting bread experiment in controlled conditions [18]. Both levels of medium and heavily toasted bread contributed to concentrations above the limit values for CH 2 Particulate matter levels (both PM2.5 and PM10) during the frying process were significantly higher than the ones found during the boiling process in both dwellings.…”
Section: Emissions From Toastingsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, the levels were lower than the ones registered for the frying process. The difference in emissions between the two types of cooking methods (frying and boiling) agrees with the data presented by Abdullahi et al [44] in their review paper, which shows that frying is among the cooking processes that promote higher exposure to particulate matter [45]. Cooking involving frying and grilling in kitchens was also shown by Nasir et al [42] to lead to high fine PM concentrations, which reach mean maximum values above 1 mg·m −3 .…”
Section: Emissions From Toastingsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Given that the inhabitants were smokers, smoking might influence this factor because smoking generates particles (Charles et al, 2007). During smoking and cooking, PM 2.5 levels could reach around 3-and 30-fold of their ordinary levels, respectively (He et al, 2004). Also, possible PM 2.5 sources are ubiquitous in office environments, such as photocopying, printing, and information technology (IT) equipments, etc.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Iaq: Winter Seasonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Torkmahalleh et al (2012) found that primary PM 2.5 emission rates for peanut, canola, corn and olive oils heated at 197 • C ranged from 3.7 to 54 mg min −1 . He et al (2004) reported a PM 2.5 emission rate for frying in vegetable oils of 2.68 ± 2.18 mg min −1 . The SOA PR determined in this study was negligible compared with primary PM 2.5 emission rates for heated cooking oils and frying in vegetable oils.…”
Section: Soa Production Ratementioning
confidence: 99%