2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2017.0299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of auxiliary coherent radar receiver to target's velocity estimation

Abstract: Recent progress in bistatic radar techniques can be used to improve performances of classical monostatic radar. A prominent limitation of coherent radar is its inability to measure the complete velocity vector (magnitude and direction) of a detected target. A single coherent detection can provide range-rate only. At least two detections, separated in time, are needed to estimate the target's velocity vector. This study discusses how the velocity vector can be determined by two simultaneous detections spaced in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having estimates of target instantaneous location, estimates of the target's instantaneous velocity vector are needed to create the description of its kinematic state, on which some other recent work has concentrated. The methods for evaluating the target velocity and its covariance matrix have been investigated based on the maximum likelihood estimation theories [22]- [24] or sparse Bayesian learning [25], etc. However, practical work and experimental results in this area are rarely seen for verifying the proposed algorithms and much less compared to work on target location [26]- [28], let alone with large numbers of transmitters and/or receivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having estimates of target instantaneous location, estimates of the target's instantaneous velocity vector are needed to create the description of its kinematic state, on which some other recent work has concentrated. The methods for evaluating the target velocity and its covariance matrix have been investigated based on the maximum likelihood estimation theories [22]- [24] or sparse Bayesian learning [25], etc. However, practical work and experimental results in this area are rarely seen for verifying the proposed algorithms and much less compared to work on target location [26]- [28], let alone with large numbers of transmitters and/or receivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%