2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of different physical forces to the disjoining pressure of a thin water film being pressed by an oil droplet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) is obtained considering the LPL which is not verified as jW 2 j ¼ 146 mV. Furthermore, Kumar and Biswas 16 report a glass surface potential in water lying between À45 and À85 mV for pH ¼ 6. The approximations needed for the constant surface potential model [ Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) is obtained considering the LPL which is not verified as jW 2 j ¼ 146 mV. Furthermore, Kumar and Biswas 16 report a glass surface potential in water lying between À45 and À85 mV for pH ¼ 6. The approximations needed for the constant surface potential model [ Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15] A surface force apparatus can be adapted to study liquid-liquid-solid configurations, but its use does not allow for gas-liquid-solid configurations. 1,16 Consequently, fluid-liquid-solid configurations are commonly studied using a bubble or droplet mechanically pressed over a wetting film deposited on a substrate. [17][18][19][20] The maximum disjoining pressure range experimentally achieved with this technique lies below 500 Pa. A major limitation of those methods is the drainage time one has to wait between two measurement points as it can last several hours.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 While polystyrene films were prepared by a similar graft-to procedure, 23,24 force measurements between the PS films and mica surfaces were not reported. Studies between liquid silicone films and mica surfaces have been done with AFM, 25,26 but the liquid film adds additional complexity due to hydrodynamic interactions. The siliconeÀmica system described here utilizes two inherently stable surfaces and allows for unambiguous insights into the interaction potential and specifically the separate electrostatic, hydrophobic, and steric contributions between silicone and mica surfaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 The water− hydrocarbon interface carries a negative charge attributed to the adsorption of the hydroxyl group from water to the hydrocarbon surface. 47 To describe the oil/water interfaces, application of constant charge 27 and constant potential 32 boundary conditions was reported. Thus, we decided to determine the double-layer repulsion for both cases and chose the more suitable one according to the experimental contact angle values.…”
Section: Porous Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, DLVO theory was also utilized for evaluating different processes such as colloidal stability, adsorption, , other interaction between materials in aquatic environment, , and so on. However, much evidence demonstrated that DLVO interactions were not sufficient to account for some experimental data, and other surface forces (namely, non-DLVO interaction) were required to be considered. Thus, the disjoining pressure isotherms could be written in the following general form where Π vdW and Π EDL are van der Waals and electrical double-layer disjoining pressure, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%