2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.07.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of effluent organic matter (EfOM) to ultrafiltration (UF) membrane fouling: Isolation, characterization, and fouling effect of EfOM fractions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EPM of River humic, WW humic, and WW colloids were negative throughout the entire range of Na + concentration tested (Figure 1a). This negative charge would be the results of ionized carboxyl groups present on the structure of the OM samples 20,21,30 as evidenced in previous characterization studies. 20,21 In addition, with increasing Na + concentration, the EPM of the three OM samples became less negative, suggesting charge screening (i.e., compression of diffuse double layer) due to interactions with indifferent Na + cations.…”
Section: Electrophoretic Mobility Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The EPM of River humic, WW humic, and WW colloids were negative throughout the entire range of Na + concentration tested (Figure 1a). This negative charge would be the results of ionized carboxyl groups present on the structure of the OM samples 20,21,30 as evidenced in previous characterization studies. 20,21 In addition, with increasing Na + concentration, the EPM of the three OM samples became less negative, suggesting charge screening (i.e., compression of diffuse double layer) due to interactions with indifferent Na + cations.…”
Section: Electrophoretic Mobility Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This negative charge would be the results of ionized carboxyl groups present on the structure of the OM samples 20,21,30 as evidenced in previous characterization studies. 20,21 In addition, with increasing Na + concentration, the EPM of the three OM samples became less negative, suggesting charge screening (i.e., compression of diffuse double layer) due to interactions with indifferent Na + cations. River humic and WW humic displayed a considerably higher negative charge than WW colloids at every solution condition tested due to their higher abundance of carboxyl groups in their structures, 20,21 and were consistent with previous investigations.…”
Section: Electrophoretic Mobility Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations