2015
DOI: 10.1177/1071100715596607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of Lateral Column Lengthening to Correction of Forefoot Abduction in Stage IIb Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity Reconstruction

Abstract: Correction of forefoot abduction in flatfoot reconstruction was primarily determined by the LCL procedure and could be modeled linearly. We believe that the lateral incongruency angle can serve as a valuable preoperative measurement to help surgeons titrate the proper amount of correction performed intraoperatively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
56
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…54,84 Optimal LCL graft size may be determined by literature-based formulas, in which each additional millimeter of lengthening performed corresponds to a 6.8-degree change in lateral incongruency angle. 22 The amount of graft is typically 4 to 8 mm, the amount required to correct forefoot abduction without losing all eversion.…”
Section: Forefoot Abductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…54,84 Optimal LCL graft size may be determined by literature-based formulas, in which each additional millimeter of lengthening performed corresponds to a 6.8-degree change in lateral incongruency angle. 22 The amount of graft is typically 4 to 8 mm, the amount required to correct forefoot abduction without losing all eversion.…”
Section: Forefoot Abductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 In more severe deformities, when forefoot abduction is severe and talonavicular uncoverage exceeds 30%, LCL may be beneficial to achieve the necessary correction. 22,31,67 MCO and LCL can be combined to achieve large amounts of correction. 86,108 Biomechanically, this is advantageous because it provides enhanced deformity correction and reduces lateral foot pressures that may cause pain or other lateral column complications.…”
Section: Forefoot Abductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lateral column lengthening has been used to deal with flatfoot with prominent forefoot abduction deformity, which is of great significance to the reduction of talonavicular abduction angle [ 13 , 14 ]. A cadaveric experiment performed by Baxter et al showed that LCL procedure could correct 60% hindfoot valgus deformity in addition to 100% midfoot abduction deformity [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oh et al [10] found that the talonavicular coverage angle was corrected by approximately 4° with each 2 mm increase in Evans LCL. Chan et al also reported that about 2-3° or 2% of the talonavicular coverage angle was corrected per millimeter of LCL clinically [18]. However, Benthien et al [17] found that the talonavicular coverage angle decreased from 46° to 24° with a 10 mm LCL in the flatfoot model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%