2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1329-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of nitrogen fixation to the external nitrogen load of a water quality control reservoir (Kis-Balaton Water Protection System, Hungary)

Abstract: To reduce external nutrient loading by the greatest nutrient transporter to Lake Balaton, the Kis-Balaton Water Protection System commenced operation in 1985. Cyanobacterial blooms (Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii, Aphanizomenon sp. and Anabaena sp.) cause nitrogen loading via nitrogen fixation, which can exceed the total external N-load to the reservoir during the summer. Nitrogen fixation of phytoplankton in the system in 2009 was measured using the 15 N-isotope technique. The light dependence of fixation was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
9
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the P concentrations and light intensities in our microcosms were higher than those typical during summer in Langer See (Supporting Information S2), and in addition to explaining the higher biovolumes and N 2 -fixation rates in the microcosms, they may also have improved the Nostocales ability to adapt to the N addition gradient. Nevertheless, the rates measured in our manipulated microcosms (1.8-13.3 μg N mm −3 d −1 ) were of the same magnitude as those observed under natural conditions (0.06-18.4 μg N mm −3 d −1 ) in the studies of Gu et al (1997) and Horváth, Mátyás, Süle, & Présing, 2013. We converted the published per litre rates of Gu et al (1997) and Horváth et al (2013) to rates per Nostocales biovolume using information extracted from Figure 4 (Gu, Havens, Schelske, & Rosen, 1997) and from Figure 2 and Table 2 ( Horváth et al, 2013), and assuming 12 hr of sufficient light for fixation per day.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Both the P concentrations and light intensities in our microcosms were higher than those typical during summer in Langer See (Supporting Information S2), and in addition to explaining the higher biovolumes and N 2 -fixation rates in the microcosms, they may also have improved the Nostocales ability to adapt to the N addition gradient. Nevertheless, the rates measured in our manipulated microcosms (1.8-13.3 μg N mm −3 d −1 ) were of the same magnitude as those observed under natural conditions (0.06-18.4 μg N mm −3 d −1 ) in the studies of Gu et al (1997) and Horváth, Mátyás, Süle, & Présing, 2013. We converted the published per litre rates of Gu et al (1997) and Horváth et al (2013) to rates per Nostocales biovolume using information extracted from Figure 4 (Gu, Havens, Schelske, & Rosen, 1997) and from Figure 2 and Table 2 ( Horváth et al, 2013), and assuming 12 hr of sufficient light for fixation per day.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The escaped fish specimens were drifted downstream and were captured in the reservoir. Fish fauna composition of the latter years of the studied period showed strong relationship with the mean concentration of total dissolved solids, which normally indicates the ongoing eutrophication process (Hatvani et al, 2011;Horváth et al, 2013).…”
Section: Environmental Parameters and Assemblage Developmentmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this pioneer phase, decay of inundated organic matter was dominant among internal processes, as significant correlation with BOD and NH 4 þ shows. Fish fauna composition of the latter years of the studied period showed strong relationship with the mean concentration of total dissolved solids, which normally indicates the ongoing eutrophication process (Hatvani et al, 2011;Horváth et al, 2013). It might lead to the assumption that these parameters had only a minor influence on the composition of the fish assemblage.…”
Section: Environmental Parameters and Assemblage Developmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We must point out that the nutrient stock in T. natans meadows is likely to be an underestimation of the real nutrient uptake because we only considered above-water biomass (e.g., in July above and below water biomass of Tn were 60% and 40% of total biomass; Pinardi et al, 2011) and without leaf turnover during the whole vegetative period (e.g., by doubling the maximum standing stock; galanti and Topa esposito, 1996). if we assume that these values are generally representative of the allocation of biomass above and below water, and an equal allocation of nutrients for above and below water plant parts, then we estimate that the total nutrient storage in T. natans biomass is up to 11.7 n t and 1.3 P t. according to published works describing nutrient or chemical inflow and water discharge data over time, we calculate a total load for the growing season period (May-october) of 72-206 t n and 6-13 t P (szilagyi et al, 1990;Pomogyi, 1993;Tátrai et al, 2000;hatvani et al, 2011;horváth et al, 2013;Paulovits et al, 2014). The comparison of nutrient content in macrophyte beds derived from aPeX maps with nutrient load inflowing by the Zala river evidenced that about 6-16% and 10-21% of n and P, respectively, can be temporarily stored in T. natans biomass.…”
Section: Nutrient Removal Capacity In Lake Hídvégimentioning
confidence: 99%