Contribution of Regionalized Methane Emissions to Greenhouse Gas Intensity of Natural Gas-Fired Electricity and Carbon Capture in the United States

Abstract

Natural gas is a fossil fuel primarily comprised of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas. As such, both combustion and direct atmospheric emissions of natural gas contribute to climate change. Natural gas supply chain methane emissions vary substantially based on extraction region and processes, such that natural gas end users experience very different lifecycle greenhouse gas intensities even for similar uses. Methane emissions have relevant implications for decarbonization pathways that use natural gas to generate electricity (with or without carbon capture) or remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. This Letter combines state-specific estimates of the methane emissions intensity of natural gas supplies with generator-level modeling to estimate the contribution of methane emissions to the greenhouse gas intensity of natural gas-fired electricity and carbon capture in the United States. For existing electricity generation, state-specific methane emissions factors are matched to individual natural gas-fired generators to estimate the [minimum, maximum] range for the carbon dioxide equivalent contribution of methane (100-year global warming potential = 29.8) relative to direct carbon dioxide emissions by balancing authority ([15%, 48%]), utility ([13%, 48%]), and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation region ([16%, 36%]). Methane emissions constrain the greenhouse gas avoidance or removal potential of natural-gas-fired carbon capture.

Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics of Carbon Emissions from Industrial Land in Anhui Province, China

“…As CO 2 is the main greenhouse gas, CE is usually a general term for, or a synonym of, greenhouse gas emissions [31]. In this study, CE refers to the total amount of direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions generated by a certain entity within a certain period, represented by carbon [32,33]. CE is mainly divided into renewable energy and non-renewable energy CE.…”

US power sector carbon capture and storage under the Inflation Reduction Act could be costly with limited or negative abatement potential

“…Essentially, 45Q rewards higher generation of CO 2 in exchange for not allowing it to escape to the atmosphere, creating potentially perverse incentives to generate more CO 2 than would have otherwise occurred, much like those observed with refrigerant destruction under the Clean Development Mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol (Wara 2008). Subsidies for CCS that are intended to drive emissions abatement or carbon dioxide removal (CDR) can mitigate this issue by tying subsidies to demonstrated net abatement or removal, considering both counterfactuals (Haya et al 2020) and life cycle emissions (Burns and Grubert 2021). Counterfactuals and life cycle emissions can both be more challenging to analyze than CO 2 flow volumes, and fundamental uncertainties can pose particular challenges in contexts like tax credits that rely on extremely clear, precise accounting and liability allocation.…”

Is hydrogen production through natural gas pyrolysis compatible with ambitious climate targets in the United States? A location-specific, time-resolved analysis

“…Because they did not provide upper and lower bounds for their estimation, the upper and lower bounds determined by Omara for national production were applied instead (Omara et al 2018). For non-production CH 4 emissions, state-specific estimates are not available, instead 0.5% of CH 4 emissions are added in all states (Burns and Grubert 2021b). End use emissions of CH 4 were not included in this analysis because an end use of the natural gas and hydrogen was not specified.…”