2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of the diffusive exchange method to the characterization of pore-water in consolidated argillaceous rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, physical extraction methods are laborious and have the potential for evaporative isotopic fractionation caused by storage, multistep procedures, or by incomplete recovery of the water or evaporative loss during handling. Alternative methods for obtaining pore water isotopes from cores include radial diffusion mass-balance mixing cells (Altinier et al, 2007;Bensenouci et al, 2013;Rubel et al, 2002;Savoye et al, 2006;van der Kamp et al, 1996) or direct equilibration of the pore water in core sub-samples using helium-CO 2 or a He-H 2 catalyst mixtures with headspace gas-water equilibration (Hendry et al, 2004;Kelln et al, 2007;Koehler et al, 2000). Wassenaar et al (2008) proposed a novel method for measuring the δ 2 H and δ 18 O of pore water in saturated and unsaturated geologic (core, soil) samples by using a direct vapour equilibration and laser spectrometry (DVE-LS) approach.…”
Section: Published By Copernicus Publications On Behalf Of the Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, physical extraction methods are laborious and have the potential for evaporative isotopic fractionation caused by storage, multistep procedures, or by incomplete recovery of the water or evaporative loss during handling. Alternative methods for obtaining pore water isotopes from cores include radial diffusion mass-balance mixing cells (Altinier et al, 2007;Bensenouci et al, 2013;Rubel et al, 2002;Savoye et al, 2006;van der Kamp et al, 1996) or direct equilibration of the pore water in core sub-samples using helium-CO 2 or a He-H 2 catalyst mixtures with headspace gas-water equilibration (Hendry et al, 2004;Kelln et al, 2007;Koehler et al, 2000). Wassenaar et al (2008) proposed a novel method for measuring the δ 2 H and δ 18 O of pore water in saturated and unsaturated geologic (core, soil) samples by using a direct vapour equilibration and laser spectrometry (DVE-LS) approach.…”
Section: Published By Copernicus Publications On Behalf Of the Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling water from wells is not possible in formations with very low permeabilities or at larger depths, and pore water data have to be obtained by indirect methods from core samples [ Kelln et al , 2001; Sacchi et al , 2001; Pearson et al , 2003; Savoye et al , 2006]. While Remenda et al [1994] partly applied squeezing, Hendry and Wassenaar [1999] (for part of the data) and Patriarche et al [2004b] (for Cl − ) used radial diffusion cells with equilibration via a water phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volumetric moisture content, , is calculated from the water content using the following expression [27]:…”
Section: Petrophysical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%