2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2016.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of AM fungi and soil organic matter to plant productivity in tropical savanna soils under different land uses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our finding shows a negative association between RR and rainfall and soil P, which would support the plant compensation hypothesis, we found positive, not negative associations between RR and plant P. Additionally, both unfenced and fenced plant biomasses are not associated with soil P, further negating the plant compensation hypothesis. However, the weak negative response of RR to soil P may arise from potential negative association between soil P and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi that typically colonize grasses in the Serengeti (Soka and Ritchie 2016), which may enhance plant P (Smith and Read 2008) at low soil P, similar to other systems (Miller et al 1995, Liu et al 2012, Propster and Johnson 2015.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although our finding shows a negative association between RR and rainfall and soil P, which would support the plant compensation hypothesis, we found positive, not negative associations between RR and plant P. Additionally, both unfenced and fenced plant biomasses are not associated with soil P, further negating the plant compensation hypothesis. However, the weak negative response of RR to soil P may arise from potential negative association between soil P and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi that typically colonize grasses in the Serengeti (Soka and Ritchie 2016), which may enhance plant P (Smith and Read 2008) at low soil P, similar to other systems (Miller et al 1995, Liu et al 2012, Propster and Johnson 2015.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although plant N increased with soil N (Fig S2a), plant P showed considerable variation that was unexplained by soil P, especially at low soil P (Fig S2b). This mismatch suggests that plants may maintain tissue P despite low soil P as a result of mutualistic resource exchanges (Antoninka et al 2015, Soka and Ritchie 2016, Ritchie and Raina 2016 or due to changing plant community composition (Ceulemans et al 2014, Anderson et al 2018. Regardless of the mechanism, herbivores ultimately respond to plant nutrient concentrations.…”
Section: Study Site and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the main reason why soil fertility is linked to the composition, abundance and diversity of the soil fungal community (Ellouze et al, ; Pankhurst & Lynch, ; Siciliano et al, ). For instance, a recent study concluded that SOM content, along with high abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, were the key factors explaining yield increases in Zea mays and Themeda triandra across different soil types (Soka & Ritchie, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AMF are important microbial symbioses for plants in nutrients poor soils [6][7][8], and are significant in the maintenance of soil health and fertility, plant community development, nutrient uptake and above the ground productivity [1,2,9]. Plants exchange carbon (C) for fungal phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil has been reported to be a complex system wherein chemical, physical and biochemical factors are held in dynamic equilibrium [26]. Studies of AM hyphal abundance provide information on the biochemical processes occurring in soil [8,22]. There is growing evidence that soil biological parameters may be potential and sensitive indicators of soil fertility [27] and management induced changes in soil quality [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%