2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-010-9972-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of habitat sampling and alkalinity to diatom diversity and distributional patterns in streams: implications for conservation

Abstract: Diatoms, microscopic unicellular algae, have been widely sampled from streams around the world because of their use in biological assessments, but as a result they are often only collected from epilithic habitats in riffles, which may lead to a substantial underreporting of their diversity and distributional patterns. The goals of this study were to identify how sampling methods and water chemistry affect the characterization of local and regional diversity and distributions. Species richness, Shannon diversit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, beside better classifying intermittent streams, multi-habitat sampling presents also important implications in documenting species distribution and autecology. In heterogeneous streams, MHs potentially host rare and under-dispersed diatom species, which present higher risks for regional extinction and are largely underestimated through the sole traditional sampling approach (Smucker and Vis, 2011). Indeed, for biodiversity assessment purposes, samplings from different MHs are more advisable (Jüttner et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, beside better classifying intermittent streams, multi-habitat sampling presents also important implications in documenting species distribution and autecology. In heterogeneous streams, MHs potentially host rare and under-dispersed diatom species, which present higher risks for regional extinction and are largely underestimated through the sole traditional sampling approach (Smucker and Vis, 2011). Indeed, for biodiversity assessment purposes, samplings from different MHs are more advisable (Jüttner et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-habitat sampling would provide a better representation of the site conditions and integrate the information missed in a single standard sampling (Smucker and Vis, 2011). The analysis of different MHs can also provide important information in terms of species autecology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species was significantly present in pristine sites characterized by microlithal as the main substrate, and its abundance was not limited by isolation from the main flow. Nitzschia tabellaria, considered as being characteristic of habitats of high conservation value (Potapova and Charles 2007;Smucker and Vis 2011) was particularly abundant in the UP site of the Argentina stream.…”
Section: Conservation Status: Red List Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation among these communities thus potentially affects the whole ecosystem, and better knowledge of the key factors determining microbial communities is urgently needed (Van der Gucht et al 2007). Due to their high diversity, relatively well-defined habitat preferences, short generation times, and generally-yet not invariably-geographically wide distribution, microbial algae such as diatoms are useful model taxa in testing different ecological theories over short timescales (Smucker and Vis 2011). So far, studies of community dynamics and especially spatiotemporal variation in species composition for microbial eukaryotic organisms are still rare compared with those of macroorganisms (Martiny et al 2006;Meier and Soininen 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%