1999
DOI: 10.2108/zsj.16.595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of Superior and Inferior Tentacles to Learned Food-Avoidance Behavior in Limax marginatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we demonstrated the learning ability of the ITamputated slugs, these data are not congruent with a previous report (Kimura et al, 1999) showing that post-conditioning amputation of IT abolished the ability to retain or retrieve odor-aversion memory. There are several possible explanations for this disagreement.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we demonstrated the learning ability of the ITamputated slugs, these data are not congruent with a previous report (Kimura et al, 1999) showing that post-conditioning amputation of IT abolished the ability to retain or retrieve odor-aversion memory. There are several possible explanations for this disagreement.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we examined the roles of STs and ITs in the acquisition and the retrieval of odoraversion memory by surgically amputating tentacle pairs. Kimura et al (Kimura et al, 1999) have previously investigated the effect of amputation of STs or ITs after olfactory conditioning on the retention and/or retrieval of olfactory aversive memory. They showed that IT amputation after conditioning degraded memory retrieval, whereas ST amputation had no such effect, suggesting that the olfactory inputs from the ITs were important for the retention and/or retrieval of aversive memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting that PC responses to STN and ITN stimulations are the same, in spite of memory functions of PC [27,30,38,40] and functional differences between STs (orientation) and ITs (memory) [27][28][29][30][31]. This implies that direct olfactory inputs to PC would not explain the differences in memory functions between STs and ITs.…”
Section: Information Flows In the Whole Brainmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Noses of these animals are located on the tips of two pairs of tentacles (superior and inferior tentacles, STs and ITs). Several behavioral and physiological studies have revealed that there are functional differences between STs and ITs [27][28][29][30][31]; ST is involved in olfactory orientation [28], whereas IT is involved in learning [29] or retrieving odors [27,31]. Their brain can be dissected and isolated as a whole without a lose in the function of these olfactory organs [23,24,27,32,33].…”
Section: Information Flows In the Whole Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gastropod mollusks such as Aplysia, Limax, Hermissenda [9][10][11][12][13][14] and Lymnaea [15][16][17][18][19] are excellent model animals for understanding the causal neuronal mechanisms of learning and memory. In this decade, the Lukowiak's group in University of Calgary has tested the effects of EpiC on cognition in Lymnaea stagnalis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%