“…Note that there are some important differences among these schemes, including the handling of the turbulent Prandtl number, diffusion above the boundary layer, and specification of the critical bulk‐Richardson number (Bu et al, ). Although the K‐profile parameterization scheme has its limitations as cautioned by Kepert (), it has been proved to work well in modeling the intensity and structure of tropical cyclones (e.g., Ma et al, ; Ma, Fei, Huang, et al, ; Ma, Fei, Cheng, et al, ; Nolan, Zhang, et al, ; Nolan, Stern, et al, ; Zhang et al, ), and performs satisfactorily in the HWRF model (Gopalakrishnan et al, ; Zhang et al, , ). As a typical K‐profile parameterization scheme, the YSU scheme is chosen to parameterize boundary‐layer processes in this study.…”