2019
DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201808-564ps
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Confounding and Reporting of Results in Causal Inference Studies. Guidance for Authors from Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
407
1
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 555 publications
(423 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
407
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, using an absolute BD response vs a relative response may be controversial, however, we found using the absolute change did not significantly alter our overall conclusions. We recognize the limitations of stepwise logistic regression and the potential to impact the variable selection process . As our study is inherently exploratory, were are unable to use the preferred causal methods of prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, using an absolute BD response vs a relative response may be controversial, however, we found using the absolute change did not significantly alter our overall conclusions. We recognize the limitations of stepwise logistic regression and the potential to impact the variable selection process . As our study is inherently exploratory, were are unable to use the preferred causal methods of prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, certain variables (for example, recipient age) were not included even if the P value was <.1 on univariate analysis . We included only one time‐dependent variable in each multivariable model to avoid overinflation of risk; as a result, we present three multivariable models .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each treatment exposure (pulmonary toxic chemotherapy, chest radiation, and thoracic surgery), unadjusted and adjusted models were fitted. We used directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) implemented in DAGitty to select a minimal sufficient adjustment set of variables to allow estimation of an unconfounded effect of each treatment exposure on respiratory admissions From the DAG (available at http://dagitty.net/m6dZKD2) the minimal sufficient adjustment set included deprivation, diagnosis age, diagnosis year, diagnostic group and treatment exposures. Further models were examined including an interaction term between age group (children and AYA) and pulmonary toxic chemotherapy and chest radiation to determine whether the association between treatment and risk of admission differed by age.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%