9th Aeroacoustics Conference 1984
DOI: 10.2514/6.1984-2298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of flow separation by sound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two-stream centerline velocity decay data are shown in figure 6 in terms of equation (2). It is apparent that the Le term provides good correlation of the excited and unexcited centerline two-stream velocity decay data.…”
Section: Centerline Velocity Decaymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The two-stream centerline velocity decay data are shown in figure 6 in terms of equation (2). It is apparent that the Le term provides good correlation of the excited and unexcited centerline two-stream velocity decay data.…”
Section: Centerline Velocity Decaymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The higher vorticity flux levels suggest that a somewhat improved performance can be expected from the SAP airfoil. 4. CONCLUDING REMARKS Success in controlling compressible dynamic stall using a dynamically shape adaptive airfoil (as determined by the peak suction pressure development, vorticity flux and deformation schedule) has been reported.…”
Section: E Vorticity Flux Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic excitation 10 has also been used to control unsteady separated ows, but the acoustic power requirements increase disproportionately with increasing Mach number, and, thus, it does not appear to be practical for compressible dynamic stall control.…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%