The primary objective of this investigation is to determine experimentally the sources of jet mixing noise. In the present study, four different approaches are used. It is reasonable to assume that the characteristics of the noise sources are imprinted on their radiation fields. Under this assumption, it becomes possible to analyse the characteristics of the far-field sound and then infer back to the characteristics of the sources. The first approach is to make use of the spectral and directional information measured by a single microphone in the far field. A detailed analysis of a large collection of far-field noise data has been carried out. The purpose is to identify special characteristics that can be linked directly to those of the sources. The second approach is to measure the coherence of the sound field using two microphones. The autocorrelations and cross-correlations of these measurements offer not only valuable information on the spatial structure of the noise field in the radial and polar angle directions, but also on the sources inside the jet. The third approach involves measuring the correlation between turbulence fluctuations inside a jet and the radiated noise in the far field. This is the most direct and unambiguous way of identifying the sources of jet noise. In the fourth approach, a mirror microphone is used to measure the noise source distribution along the lengths of high-speed jets. Features and trends observed in noise source strength distributions are expected to shed light on the source mechanisms. It will be shown that all four types of data indicate clearly the existence of two distinct noise sources in jets. One source of noise is the fine-scale turbulence and the other source is the large turbulence structures of the jet flow. Some of the salient features of the sound field associated with the two noise sources are reported in this paper.

The primary objective of this investigation is to determine experimentally the sources of jet mixing noise. In the present study, four different approaches are used. It is reasonable to assume that the characteristics of the noise sources are imprinted on their radiation fields. Under this assumption, it becomes possible to analyse the characteristics of the far-field sound and then infer back to the characteristics of the sources. The first approach is to make use of the spectral and directional information measured by a single microphone in the far field. A detailed analysis of a large collection of far-field noise data has been carried out. The purpose is to identify special characteristics that can be linked directly to those of the sources. The second approach is to measure the coherence of the sound field using two microphones. The autocorrelations and cross-correlations of these measurements offer not only valuable information on the spatial structure of the noise field in the radial and polar angle directions, but also on the sources inside the jet. The third approach involves measuring the correlation between turbulence fluctuations inside a jet and the radiated noise in the far field. This is the most direct and unambiguous way of identifying the sources of jet noise. In the fourth approach, a mirror microphone is used to measure the noise source distribution along the lengths of high-speed jets. Features and trends observed in noise source strength distributions are expected to shed light on the source mechanisms. It will be shown that all four types of data indicate clearly the existence of two distinct noise sources in jets. One source of noise is the fine-scale turbulence and the other source is the large turbulence structures of the jet flow. Some of the salient features of the sound field associated with the two noise sources are reported in this paper.

It is well known that when a high subsonic (Mach number > 0.7) high Reynolds number (Re > 2 × 105) jet is directed normal to a wall intense discrete frequency sound waves called impingement tones are emitted. This phenomenon has been studied by a number of investigators in the past. It is generally accepted that the tones are generated by a feedback loop. Despite this general agreement critical difference in opinion as to how the feedback is achieved remains unresolved. Early investigators (e.g. Wagner 1971; Neuwerth 1973, 1974) proposed that the feedback loop is closed by acoustic disturbances which propagate from the wall to the nozzle exit inside the jet. Recent investigators (e.g. Ho & Nosseir 1981; Umeda et al. 1987), However, believed that the feedback is achieved by sound waves propagating outside the jet. In this paper a new feedback mechanism is proposed. It is suggested that the feedback is achieved by upstream-propagating waves associated with the lowest-order intrinsic neutral wave modes of the jet flow. These wave modes have well-defined radial and azimuthal pressure and velocity distributions. These distributions are dictated by the mean flow of the jet exactly as in the case of the well-known Kelvin-Helmholtz instability waves. The characteristics of these waves are calculated and studied. These characteristics provide a natural explanation of why the unsteady flow fields of subsonic impinging jets must be axisymmetric, whereas those for supersonic jets may be either axisymmetric or helical (flapping). In addition they also offer, for the first time, an explanation as to why no stable impingement tones have been observed for (cold) subsonic jets with Mach number less than 0.6. Furthermore, the new model allows the prediction of the average Strouhal number of impingement tones as a function of jet Mach number. The predicted results compare very favourably with measurements. For subsonic jets the pressure and velocity field of these upstream-propagating neutral waves are found to be confined primarily inside the jet. This is in agreement with the observations of Wagner (1971) and Neuwerth (1973, 1974) and their contention that the feedback disturbances actually propagate upstream inside the jet.

This paper discusses results of an experimental study on jet-mixing enhancement of heated and unheated, subsonic and underexpanded supersonic model jets bj mechanical protuberances (tabs) located at the nozzle lip. It is shown that considerable mixing enhancement is obtained by these devices. Relative performance of two, three, and four tabs is also evaluated. It is found that the best overall effect is produced by two tabs located diametrically opposite to each other. Limited temperature measurements indicate considerable reduction in the plume temperature. Likewise, it is found that the screech noise associated with supersonic underexpanded jets can be reduced and in many cases completely eliminated.

No abstract