Control of Leading-Edge Vortex Breakdown by Trailing Edge Injection

Mitchell, Anthony; Barberis, D.; Molton, Pascal; Délery, Jean

doi:10.2514/2.2942

Cited by 21 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our previous study [39], we postulated that the unfavorable effect of blowing on the nonblowing side is possibly caused by sideslip effect due to blowing as the entrainment of the flow by the ejected fluid potentially creates a crossflow component from the nonblowing side. Similar observations were also reported by some earlier studies with other control techniques such as asymmetric trailing-edge blowing [23,27] or asymmetric along-the-core blowing [34]. Mitchell et al [27] postulated that "the asymmetric blowing blocks the flow on the side where it is applied, and as a result, the flow works its way to the other side" in their asymmetric (i.e., single side) trailing-edge blowing study.…”

Section: Further Discussion On a Single Side/differential Forebodysupporting

confidence: 56%

“…It is generally believed that trailing-edge blowing [23][24][25][26][27][28] or suction [29] techniques delay vortex breakdown by decreasing the downstream pressure gradient, and along-the-core blowing technique [30][31][32][33][34] delays vortex breakdown by increasing the axial velocity (i.e., a reduction in the swirl number). Dixon [35] believed that SWB on the wing provides sweeplike effects as the SWB jets are entrained in the leading-edge vortices.…”

Section: Nomenclaturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…These include mechanical devices such as leading-edge flaps [9][10][11][12], apex fences [13], canards, strakes, leading-edge extensions (LEXs), or double-delta wing [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and pneumatic techniques such as trailing-edge blowing [23][24][25][26][27][28] or suction [29], along-the-core blowing technique [30][31][32][33][34], spanwise blowing (SWB) [35][36][37], and some other blowing/suction techniques [38] with different blowing/suction locations and orientations.…”

Section: Nomenclaturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Forebody Slot Blowing on Vortex Breakdown and Load Over a Delta Wing

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

shows that a forebody slot blowing technique significantly delays vortex breakdown over a delta wing. Blowing only on one side while delaying vortex breakdown has an opposite effect on the nonblowing side. Although the authors provided a plausible explanation for the observed behavior, no concrete evidence was given. In this paper, we address this issue and further evaluate the effects of symmetric and differential blowing on the aerodynamic loads. Flow visualization and force measurement were carried out in a water tunnel at a Reynolds number of 8:5 10 4 . Our study shows that the differing effect of differential blowing can be traced to a combination of forebody slot blowing itself and the interaction of the vortices from both sides resulting in a side-slip-like effect. Moreover, symmetrical forebody slot blowing, apart from producing a significant delay in the formation of vortex breakdown, increases the lift by more than 5%. Differential blowing can be used to manipulate the vortex breakdown position and change the roll moment of the wing, which suggests that the method can be a potential means for roll control. Nomenclature= blowing momentum coefficient for port side slot C S = blowing momentum coefficient for starboard side slot c = root chord Q = volume flow rate of blowing q = dynamic pressure of freestream Re = Reynolds number, Uc=v S = area of delta wing U = freestream velocity V j = average slot exit velocity X b = vortex breakdown position from the apex of the wing X bmean = mean vortex breakdown position X bmean P = mean port side vortex breakdown position X bmean S = mean starboard side vortex breakdown position = kinematic viscosity of water = density of blowing fluid

show abstract

Section: Further Discussion On a Single Side/differential Forebodysupporting

confidence: 56%

Section: Nomenclaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Nomenclaturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Forebody Slot Blowing on Vortex Breakdown and Load Over a Delta Wing

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The values of the momentum coefficient used in the experiments are realistic for thrust-vectoring applications and also have been used by previous investigators [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Experiments were conducted for both periodic and transient (ramp) variations of the jet momentum coefficient.…”

Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At a sufficiently high angle of attack, the vortices undergo a sudden expansion known as vortex breakdown [6,7], which has adverse aerodynamic effects on delta wing performance. Several investigations [8][9][10][11][12][13] demonstrated that thrust-vectoring jets at the trailing edge could delay vortex breakdown significantly, up to 50% of wing chord. Therefore, significant effects on the aerodynamic forces and moments on the wings are expected.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Unsteady Trailing-Edge Blowing on Delta Wing Aerodynamics

Jiang

Wang

Gursul

2010

Journal of Aircraft

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effects of unsteady trailing-edge blowing on delta wing aerodynamics were investigated experimentally to understand the aerodynamics-propulsion interaction for dynamic thrust vectoring. Two models with sweep angles of 50 and 65 deg, representing nonslender and slender delta wings, respectively, were tested in a water tunnel. Flow visualization and velocity and force measurements were conducted at stall and poststall incidences. For the periodic blowing, it was found that the dynamic response of leading-edge vortex breakdown and wing normal force coefficient exhibit phase lags for both nonslender and slender delta wings. The estimated time constants are larger than those reported in the literature for unsteady wings undergoing pitching or plunging. In the case of transient blowing, the time delay for the decelerating jet is significantly larger than that for the accelerating jet. The variation of the circulation and the reattachment process near the wing surface were studied by means of velocity measurements. The range of the estimated time constants is similar at the stall and poststall incidences for both the slender and nonslender wings.= dimensionless frequency, fc=U 1 q = freestream dynamic pressure Re = Reynolds number S w = wing surface area s = local semispan T = period t = wing thickness or time U jet = jet velocity U 1 = freestream velocity u = velocity X bd = distance from wing apex to leading-edge vortex breakdown location y jet = spanwise location of jet = wing incidence = jet pitch angle = circulation X bd = peak-to-peak amplitude of the variation of the vortex breakdown location = leading-edge sweep angle = fluid kinematic viscosity = air density = time constant = phase lag ! = angular frequency ! x = streamwise vorticity

show abstract

Vortex-based Control Algorithms

Vainchtein

Mezić

2006

Control of Fluid Flow

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Control of Leading-Edge Vortex Breakdown by Trailing Edge Injection

Cited by 21 publications

References 14 publications

Forebody Slot Blowing on Vortex Breakdown and Load Over a Delta Wing

Forebody Slot Blowing on Vortex Breakdown and Load Over a Delta Wing

Effects of Unsteady Trailing-Edge Blowing on Delta Wing Aerodynamics

Vortex-based Control Algorithms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About