Stem‐Cell Nanoengineering 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118540640.ch12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Mesenchymal Stem‐Cell Fate by Engineering the Nanoenvironment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 122 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, unlike the parameters discussed above, the growth surface does not have to be monitored or controlled during MSC production, so it falls outside the technical definition of a CPP. The expression of certain surface markers by MSCs reflects the stiffness of the growth surface, so it is clear that the surface affects the phenotype [56]. As stated above, the ability to adhere to plastic surfaces is one of the minimal criteria that define MSCs, and tissue-culture plastic is therefore the most commonly-used growth surface.…”
Section: Growth Surface Cell Harvest and Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike the parameters discussed above, the growth surface does not have to be monitored or controlled during MSC production, so it falls outside the technical definition of a CPP. The expression of certain surface markers by MSCs reflects the stiffness of the growth surface, so it is clear that the surface affects the phenotype [56]. As stated above, the ability to adhere to plastic surfaces is one of the minimal criteria that define MSCs, and tissue-culture plastic is therefore the most commonly-used growth surface.…”
Section: Growth Surface Cell Harvest and Storagementioning
confidence: 99%