“…In the active bacterial enzyme, the εCTD is proposed to adopt a condensed or ‘down’ conformation (Krah et al, 2017), and this state has been observed for isolated ε subunit from E. coli (Uhlin et al, 1997; Wilkens and Capaldi, 1998a) and Geobacillus stearothermophilus (or Bacillus PS3, hereafter termed PS3) (Yagi et al, 2007) as well as in isolated F 1 from Caldalkalibacillus thermarum (Ferguson et al, 2016). In autoinhibited states observed in crystal structures of F 1 from E. coli and PS3, the εCTDs are extended in similar ‘up’ conformations, so that a helix inserts into the F 1 central cavity and appears to block rotation of the complex by binding to both the central rotor subunit γ and several surrounding α and β subunits (Sielaff et al, 2018; Cingolani and Duncan, 2011; Mendoza-Hoffmann et al, 2018) (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). However, there is a key structural difference between these ‘up’ states: in E. coli, the εCTD consists of two helices (here termed εCTH1 and εCTH2; see Figure 1—figure supplement 2) separated by an extended loop, with each helix interacting with a different region of the γ subunit (Cingolani and Duncan, 2011; Rodgers and Wilce, 2000); whereas in PS3, εCTH1 and εCTH2 instead join to form one continuous helix (Shirakihara et al, 2015).…”