2009
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.023119-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of specific growth rate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract: In this contribution we resolve the long-standing dispute whether or not the Monod constant (K S ), describing the overall affinity of an organism for its growth-limiting substrate, can be related to the affinity of the transporter for that substrate (K M ). We show how this can be done via the control of the transporter on the specific growth rate; they are identical if the transport step has full control. The analysis leads to the counter-intuitive result that the affinity of an organism for its substrate is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This model requires two parameters: the maximum growth rate ( μ max ) and the glucose concentration at which growth rate is half-maximal ( K s ). Our estimates of μ max (0.43–0.52 h −1 ) and K s (0.1–0.2 mM) are similar to values estimated for S. cerevisiae strains using bulk population growth rates in batch cultures and chemostats (Snoep et al 2009), respectively. As our estimates are generated from a large number of measurements (28,000–42,000 growth rates per strain), these parameters are estimated extremely accurately with standard errors on the order of 10 −4 (i.e., three orders of magnitude smaller than the parameters).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This model requires two parameters: the maximum growth rate ( μ max ) and the glucose concentration at which growth rate is half-maximal ( K s ). Our estimates of μ max (0.43–0.52 h −1 ) and K s (0.1–0.2 mM) are similar to values estimated for S. cerevisiae strains using bulk population growth rates in batch cultures and chemostats (Snoep et al 2009), respectively. As our estimates are generated from a large number of measurements (28,000–42,000 growth rates per strain), these parameters are estimated extremely accurately with standard errors on the order of 10 −4 (i.e., three orders of magnitude smaller than the parameters).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Monod half saturation values (K S ) are typically obtained experimentally (Heijnen and Kleerebezem, 2010) and no general agreement on their mechanistic interpretation has been achieved (Liu, 2007;Wang et al, 1998;Snoep et al, 2009). For the purpose of this model, a general theoretical approach was proposed based only on the relative differences between the diffusivities of the different substrates (which implies no differences in the K S values for the species competing for the same substrate) to estimate Ks values of both the existing and postulated microbial metabolic activities (more details on the K S modelling are presented in Supplementary Information S1.4).…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criticisms in particular of the empirical constants K s and Y have been made by Ferenci [59] who remarked on the lack of attention given to determining the mechanistic bases for such ''supposed constants''. A recent attempt to address this issue was made by Snoep et al [171] who explored the relationship between the saturation constant and the affinity of the transporter for the growth-limiting substrate in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These authors have developed a core model and theory based on metabolic control analysis such that in the chemostat the pump rate controls l via its effect on the growth-limiting substrate concentration (G S P ) where the change in steady state concentration of s is given by…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%