2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2021.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of synthetic microbial consortia in time, space, and composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P. putida is a nonpathogenic environmental bacterium that naturally thrives in soil and the plant rhizosphere, but has emerged also in recent years as a metabolic engineering platform for a suite of industrial and environmental applications. ,,, One promising stratagem to strengthen the biotechnological possibilities of such platforms is to combine the intrinsic catalytic abilities of the cells with their physical shapes and material properties in what has been called synthetic morphologies. Different approaches include altering cell shape, assembling synthetic consortia with a given architecture, , and promoting adhesion to solid surfaces for forming catalytic biofilms. In the last case, the predominant strategy is the manipulation of the native cdGMP network of species/strain at stake for production of surface-gluing polymers that secure bacterial binding to any material at hand. , In this work we present a further step in this direction by either (i) combining the natural biofilm forming potential of P. putida with an artificial device to provide a site of early attachment to a target solidwhich facilitates later buildup of a standard biofilmsor (ii) replacing altogether the extracellular mediators of surface attachment by a synthetic one. In either case, the key instrument to this end is ectopic expression of a nanobody that recognizes a distinct, well-defined target, thereby acting as a synthetic adhesin .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P. putida is a nonpathogenic environmental bacterium that naturally thrives in soil and the plant rhizosphere, but has emerged also in recent years as a metabolic engineering platform for a suite of industrial and environmental applications. ,,, One promising stratagem to strengthen the biotechnological possibilities of such platforms is to combine the intrinsic catalytic abilities of the cells with their physical shapes and material properties in what has been called synthetic morphologies. Different approaches include altering cell shape, assembling synthetic consortia with a given architecture, , and promoting adhesion to solid surfaces for forming catalytic biofilms. In the last case, the predominant strategy is the manipulation of the native cdGMP network of species/strain at stake for production of surface-gluing polymers that secure bacterial binding to any material at hand. , In this work we present a further step in this direction by either (i) combining the natural biofilm forming potential of P. putida with an artificial device to provide a site of early attachment to a target solidwhich facilitates later buildup of a standard biofilmsor (ii) replacing altogether the extracellular mediators of surface attachment by a synthetic one. In either case, the key instrument to this end is ectopic expression of a nanobody that recognizes a distinct, well-defined target, thereby acting as a synthetic adhesin .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable cocultivation systems should prevent faster-growing species from wiping out slower-growing ones. While standard methods (e.g., agar plates and liquid cultures) are straightforward, they cannot control the time, space, strength, and direction of cell growth and molecule exchange and increase the chance for interferences due to cell growth competition in dependence relationships (see, e.g., the review [47]). Spatial-temporally distributed chips (e.g., the multilayer mVLSI devices proposed here) are microfluidic systems with varying microfluidic chambers (i.e., monolayer traps for bacteria) that allow monoclonal and coculturing communities to grow and stay alive for short periods (e.g., hours or days) [66] while maintaining the exchange of chemicals and metabolites and preventing the effect of cell growth compe-tition.…”
Section: Design Automation "Software" Workflow Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 While creating stable consortia poses some challenges, e.g., the development of orthogonal (noncross-interacting) genetic engineering tools and control of relative growth rates, ll very recent advances in synthetic and computational biology can provide solutions to these issues. 33,34 Peptide chains can also be connected by exploiting split-protein/peptide systems. These domains are usually very small in size and can be fused to proteins without interfering with expression.…”
Section: Challenge 1: Controlling Secretion and Assembly To Deliver Engineerable Protein-based Elmsmentioning
confidence: 99%