2020
DOI: 10.3390/coatings10070680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of the Mg-Treated Iron Casting Skin Formation by S-Diffusion Blocking at the Metal–Mould Interface

Abstract: Having established that sulphur presence in the mould materials appears to have an important contribution in graphite degeneration at least in the casting surface layer, a research program is undertaken to explore the possible beneficial effect of sulphur diffusion blocking at the metal–mould interface. Test samples, with and without a thin steel sheet (up to 3 mm thickness) application on the inner surface of the mould cavity, before iron melt pouring, are considered for structure analysis. A higher nodulizin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thermal regime of iron melt processing was as follows: superheating temperature: Ts = 1550 • C; Mg-treatment temperature: Tm = 1530 • C; pouring temperature: Tp = 1350 • C. The inoculated Mg-treated iron was poured in a pyramid trunk with square section samples and with steel sheets (0.5, 1, and 3 mm thickness) inserted at the casting-mold interface (Figure 1). For comparison, a sample without a steel sheet was cast (for more details, see paper [10]). The structure evaluation in the surface layer and the casting body was made according to Figure 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The thermal regime of iron melt processing was as follows: superheating temperature: Ts = 1550 • C; Mg-treatment temperature: Tm = 1530 • C; pouring temperature: Tp = 1350 • C. The inoculated Mg-treated iron was poured in a pyramid trunk with square section samples and with steel sheets (0.5, 1, and 3 mm thickness) inserted at the casting-mold interface (Figure 1). For comparison, a sample without a steel sheet was cast (for more details, see paper [10]). The structure evaluation in the surface layer and the casting body was made according to Figure 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure evaluation in the surface layer and the casting body was made according to Figure 2. Graphite morphology analysis [10] was conducted by using a professional automat image analyzer (OMNIMET ENTERPRISE and analySIS ® FIVE Digital Imaging Solutions software version 5.0, Waukegan, IL, USA), using both the standard cast iron modulus and particle analysis software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations