“…In the history of active suspension control applications, many approaches have been studied by researchers to improve comfort and ride handling (Ding et al, 2020; Li et al, 2020; Liu et al, 2019; Konoiko et al, 2019; Talib and Darus 2017; Vahedi and Jamali 2021). As a result of the conflicting nature of performance requirements such as comfort, handling, and suspension displacement, a variety of control strategies such as linear quadratic regulator (LQR) (Sam et al, 2000), adaptive sliding control (Chen and Huang 2005), H∞ and robust H ∞ control (Du and Zhang 2007), sliding mode control (SMC) (Akbari et al, 2010), FL (Cózar et al, 2019; Ejegwa et al, 2021; Elbab et al, 2009; Xu et al, 2021), preview control (Oraby et al, 2007), proportional integral (PI) control (Yildiz and Kopmaz 2017), optimal control (Marzbanrad et al, 2002, 2003), and neural network methods (Al-Holou et al, 2002) have been studied to handle with the trade-off performance criteria for active suspension control. Nonetheless, by their nature, some of these methods are resource-intensive and may under-perform in unfamiliar conditions.…”