1988
DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(88)90003-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control parametrization: A unified approach to optimal control problems with general constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
192
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 344 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
192
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…control vector parameterization method (CVP) [15], to solve the defined dynamic optimization problem. This method transforms formerly infinite-dimensional dynamic optimization problem into a finite-dimensional form of NLP problem by apply-ing a piece-wise polynomial approximation of the control variables.…”
Section: Dynamic Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…control vector parameterization method (CVP) [15], to solve the defined dynamic optimization problem. This method transforms formerly infinite-dimensional dynamic optimization problem into a finite-dimensional form of NLP problem by apply-ing a piece-wise polynomial approximation of the control variables.…”
Section: Dynamic Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simultaneous method, also known as orthogonal collocation approach [4,5,52], the state trajectories are parameterized and the residuals of the differential equations are enforced as constraints at specified collocation times. In the sequential method [6,22], the state trajectories are regarded as functions of the control decision variables. In the direct multiple shooting method [8], the state trajectories are formed by piecing together those of finite single shooting problems on the corresponding subintervals over which the param-eterized control is applied (see p.243 in [8]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be implemented by discretization of the controls and/or the states, depending on the selected discretization approach, and solving the problem using one of the nonlinear programming algorithms such as sequential quadratic programming (SQP), interior points, genetic algorithm (GA) etc. Although its ease and robustness, this method can only give suboptimal/approximate solution [6]- [9]. One of the preferred methods of the direct approaches is the inverse dynamics-based optimization which has three distinctive features: (a) it does not need the inverse mass matrix, (b) only the states of the target system are discretized, and (c)the ability to convert the original optimal control into algebraic equations which are easy to deal with.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%