2020
DOI: 10.34117/bjdv6n7-383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controle de qualidade de uma formulação de enxaguatório bucal à base de Libidibia Ferrea L.

Abstract: Controle de qualidade de uma formulação de enxaguatório bucal à base deLibidibia Ferrea L.Quality control of a formulation mouthwash based on Libidibia Ferrea L.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no indication of the presence of microorganisms (bacteria, fungi or yeasts) Salmonella sp., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. They were corroborated with Venâncio et al (2015) and Souza et al (2020), since there was no indication of the presence of microorganisms in all intervals in the studies performed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There was no indication of the presence of microorganisms (bacteria, fungi or yeasts) Salmonella sp., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. They were corroborated with Venâncio et al (2015) and Souza et al (2020), since there was no indication of the presence of microorganisms in all intervals in the studies performed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…As for density, in the results by Venâncio et al (2015), it was found that the variation was acceptable in the initial experimental periods, noticing a statistical difference over time, when the Tukey test was performed, but without interfering in the final formulation characteristic. The results by Souza et al (2020) regarding sedimentation found that there was no statistically significant difference when comparing sample times and storage environments. Corresponding to the results obtained in the test performed after 24 months, an average of 1.029 g / cm³ was gathered, which did not present a statistically significant difference about the time of 60, 90, 120, and 180 days.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations