2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2008.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled traffic farming restores soil structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
48
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
48
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The agricultural traffic increased the amount of water stored in the soil, mainly until 10 cm soil depth, which can be attributed to the rearrangement of pores in the soil profile (Moraes et al, 2016a). In the 0-5 cm layer, the water content at field capacity in the plots with one tractor pass increased by 35% -from 0.26 cm 3 cm -3 (without traffic) to 0.35 cm 3 cm -3 , as a function of the increase of soil compaction level, and the consequent reduction of pore size (Moraes et al, 2016a), which favoured improvements in the water retention at more negative potentials (McHugh et al, 2009). This indicates that the traffic favoured increases of plant-available water capacity at 0-10 cm soil depth, mainly after the first pass of the 3.8 Mg tractor, with a tire-ground contact pressure of 120 kPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The agricultural traffic increased the amount of water stored in the soil, mainly until 10 cm soil depth, which can be attributed to the rearrangement of pores in the soil profile (Moraes et al, 2016a). In the 0-5 cm layer, the water content at field capacity in the plots with one tractor pass increased by 35% -from 0.26 cm 3 cm -3 (without traffic) to 0.35 cm 3 cm -3 , as a function of the increase of soil compaction level, and the consequent reduction of pore size (Moraes et al, 2016a), which favoured improvements in the water retention at more negative potentials (McHugh et al, 2009). This indicates that the traffic favoured increases of plant-available water capacity at 0-10 cm soil depth, mainly after the first pass of the 3.8 Mg tractor, with a tire-ground contact pressure of 120 kPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by which agricultural machines travel in the same places to reduce the level of compaction in cultivated areas (McHugh et al, 2009), which has resulted in increased mean productivity of the areas (Tullberg et al, 2007). The main effects of soil compaction caused by excessive agricultural traffic are the increase of soil bulk density, soil penetration resistance and, consequently, the reduction of total porosity (McPhee et al, 2015), macroporosity (Dal Ferro et al, 2014), soil-water storage (Moraes et al, 2016a) and crop root growth (Bengough, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porém, o decréscimo na RP foi maior no tratamento livre do tráfego. Estes resultados podem ser explicados em parte pelo sistema de manejo utilizado na área, em que o constante aporte de cobertura vegetal, e a presença de sistema radicular de culturas diferentes (aveia, soja, milho), condicionam a atividade biológica que contribui para a melhoria na estrutura do solo (McHUG et al, 2009). Assim, o tráfego controlado pode contribuir para aprimorar a qualidade do Sistema plantio direto por potencializar os efeitos biológicos na melhoria da estrutura (TULLBERG et al 2007;QINGJIE et al,2009).…”
Section: Resistência à Penetração Do Solounclassified
“…Soil compaction is defined as "the process by which the soil grains are rearranged to decrease void space and bring them into closer contact with one another, thereby increasing the bulk density" (Kroulík et al, 2011). Soil compaction leads to negative consequences such as the reduction of soil porosity, decrease of aeration (McHugh et al, 2009), reduction of saturated hydraulic conductivity and an increase in soil resistance to roots exploration (Balbuena et al, 2003;Valdes-Abellan et al, 2015). Some different approaches have been recently proposed in the last year for fast characterisation of soil condition, mainly consisting of sensors mounted on tines or discs allowing on the go data collection (Chukuw & Bowers, 2005;Hemmat et al, 2008;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%