Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003.
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2003.1242478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controller reconfiguration for nonlinear systems using composite observer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming the possible faults are known a priori , the passive method takes into account of all these possible faults in the design stage and does not change the controller when the fault occurs 2–7. An active method usually uses a fault detection and isolation (FDI) unit to collect the fault information and changes the controller according to the fault 8–28 . Intuitively, the active method uses more information, thus, can achieve better performance than the passive method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming the possible faults are known a priori , the passive method takes into account of all these possible faults in the design stage and does not change the controller when the fault occurs 2–7. An active method usually uses a fault detection and isolation (FDI) unit to collect the fault information and changes the controller according to the fault 8–28 . Intuitively, the active method uses more information, thus, can achieve better performance than the passive method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, the active method uses more information, thus, can achieve better performance than the passive method. One typical active FTC system widely used in the literature contains a normal controller, a FDI unit, and a fault estimation and controller redesign module 8, 9, 11–15, 19, 20, 23–28 as illustrated in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they assume the existence of an FDI mechanism which manages to identify the failures. Thomas et al 10 have developed a reconfigurable controller based on nonlinear output regulation for nonlinear systems. They have used a composite observer which estimates the states as well as failed actuator signal in the event of actuator failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first presented the idea of using multiple switching controllers and employing the servomechanism 15-19 and 2 H control theory [20][21] to address the actuator jam problem in Chang, Bajpai, and Kwatny 22 , and later extended the scope to more general issues [23][24][25][26][27] including nonlinearities, asymmetric failures, recoverability, diversified 3 redundancy, etc. In our proposed approach, we considered the nominal and all foreseeable actuator jam scenarios and their associated plants, 0 G , 1 G , … G l .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%